JVC VR-N100U manual Comparison MPEG4 vs Mjpeg, Enterprise Client Software 1, Application, Usage

Comparison – MPEG4 vs MJPEG

MPEG4

•Stream of Inter-Framed Images (I,B,P frames = Group Of Pictures)

•Easily Corruptible Video (Seconds-to- Minutes) due to Dropped Network Packets

•Video Must Be Encoded From Source and Decoded for Viewing

•Requires 3~4Mbps to Deliver Quality Streams for Video Analysis & Surveillance

•Unable to Decode Multiple Streams due to Heavy CPU Requirements

CONCLUSION:

Good for Broadcasting Application (e.g. Internet) where Video Continuity and Integrity are NOT Critical

MJPEG

•Continuous Stream of Independent and Complete Video Images

•Data Integrity During Transmission and on Storage Medium

•Video is Never Manipulated from Source (No Encode/Decode Needed)

•Quality Video is Achieved at Lower Bandwidths with Self-Contained Images

•Client Requires Minimum Processing Power to View Multiple (e.g. 16) Streams

CONCLUSION:

Good for Security (e.g. Airport) where Video Clarity, Integrity and Reliability are EXTREMELY CRITICAL

End-to-End IP Video Solution

Enterprise Client Software (1 of 6)

Application

•ZView Software

•Windows 2000/XP-based Enterprise Client Software

•Alternative to Using Your Web Browser Only

Software License

•JVC Includes Unlimited User License for ZView Application with Each VR-N100U

Usage

•Powerful Enterprise Management Tool

•Applicable for All Level of Users (Viewers, Operators, Administrators)

•Virtualization of All VR-N100U and Cameras From a Single Interface

•Supports Automatic Bridging of Subnets

•TAB Display Options are Fully Configurable to Better Match User Type

End-to-End IP Video Solution

10