
4 D. Bister et al. | Features Section | JO September 2006 |
|
|
|
COLOUR
FIGURE
(Jan 20 2003) |
(a) | (b) |
Figure 2 (a,b) Depth of field at aperture 4 and 32; please note variation of focus on teeth
19:17:06 | Rev 7.51n/W |
11/7/06 | 369598 - |
Journal of Orthodontics JOR3338.3d | The Charlesworth Group, Wakefield +44(0)1924 |
the original computer generated color using ‘SpyderPRO’ by ColorVisionTM (U.S.). The images were also ‘anonymised’ and assessed by two operators (F.M. and D.B.) for color reproduction. Neither of the assessors were color blind.
Quality of the viewfinder
Quality of the viewfinder was tested | without | a |
lens attached. The dioptre correction dial | was set | to |
0.This corrector allows long- or
Two bodies were held simultaneously against the right and left eye of the examiner; the backdrop consisted of five fluorescent light tubes. The cameras were then swapped around to avoid eye dominance distorting the findings. Two operators (R.A. and D.B.) ranked the viewfinders for size and brightness independently, and the consistency was 100%.
Quality of the macro-flash
A manual stopwatch was used to measure the time needed to recharge the
COLOUR
FIGURE
(a) | (b) | (c) |