>GEAR GUIDE 2005 REALLY INTO IT!
✚If you’ve made a commitment to shooting with a digital SLR or if you scan your film and print from your desktop, without Adobe Photoshop CS, you probably aren’t using your technology to the fullest. It is, as everyone who uses the program’s name as a verb knows, the mother of all image- editing programs. With the host of other software to complement it, you can do almost anything. Of course, Photoshop’s the most expensive. Is it worth it? Absolutely. But with this caveat: if you don’t want to learn to make it sing, save your Benjamins.
▲SOFTWARE: ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE
Adobe | Photoshop has been and remains |
the |
Photoshop CS rapher who is ready to take full | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| finest precision tool for the photog- | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| control and produce the best images | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | $169 (PHOTOSHOP |
|
| |||||||
|
| possible. REVIEWED MARCH 2004 | ||||||||
|
| UPGRADE ALONE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| $1,229 (FULL PREMIUM |
|
| Extensis Portfolio 7 | |||||
|
|
| CREATIVE SUITE) |
|
| $99.95 to upgrade | ||||
|
| www.adobe.com |
| $199.95 for full version | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| www.extensis.com | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Photoshop’s | super- | If you’re using Photoshop to edit your | |||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| sophisticated system of | images, you won’t need an organizer | ||||||
|
|
| layers, masks, |
| and | padded with features for fixing them. | ||||
|
|
| blending modes makes | Instead you’ll need one that’s dedi- | ||||||
|
|
| it possible to do subtle | cated to cataloging. Extensis Portfolio | ||||||
|
|
| (yet monumental) | cor- | 7 is an excellent solution. Create | |||||
|
|
| ||||||||
rections and detailed composite work | catalogs and search by your own | |||||||||
that’s impossible (or at least way too | keywords or organize it all using EXIF | |||||||||
tricky) to do in almost any other pro- | data. The program can even be | |||||||||
gram. Add to the mix features that are | trained to classify your pictures. Link | |||||||||
nonexistent in most other editors: total | a folder with a set of keywords and | |||||||||
color management (so you can work in | each picture you add to the folder will | |||||||||
all those color spaces your DSLR | be tagged accordingly. Portfolio does | |||||||||
shoots in), | most of the complicat- |
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
bit images (so you don’t waste the infor- | ed work for you, free- |
|
|
|
| |||||
mation your film scanner provides), sup- | ing you up to do more |
|
|
|
| |||||
port for the RAW file formats of the | shooting and less |
|
|
|
| |||||
major camera manufacturers….We | searching. REVIEWED |
|
|
|
| |||||
could go on. But the fact is this: Adobe | OCTOBER 2004 |
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tion device was prohibitive. These days | flexibility with more sophisticated | |||||||||
it’s more expensive not to calibrate, | software than the | |||||||||
since these tools quickly pay for them- | but uses the same basic device. | |||||||||
selves in saved paper and ink. The |
| And, for the more dedicated user, | ||||||||
major brands work pretty much the |
| there are two good options: | ||||||||
same way: a device, connected to your | ||||||||||
computer, | Macbeth’s | |||||||||
monitor or dangles before an LCD, |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
while you run software that creates an | ● SPYDER & SPYDERPRO: | |||||||||
ICC color profile for your screen. |
| $140 & $230; www.color- | ||||||||
| We tested Pantone ColorVision’s | vision.com, | ||||||||
SpyderPRO and got a good result— | ● OPTIX: $270; www.mona- | |||||||||
perfect for the desktop printer who |
| cosys.com, | ||||||||
wants a marked improvement in color | ● | |||||||||
matching. The SpyderPRO offers more | www.i1color.com, |
PLUG-INS
nik Color Efex Pro 2.0
$100, Standard edition $100, Dfine www.nikmulti- media.com
Mystical
Lighting
$180 street www.autofx.com
Genuine
Fractals Pro
$50, LE edition $300, Print Pro www.lizardtech.com
pxl SmartScale
$200 street |
|
|
www.extensis.com |
| |
|
| |
| ||
image editors. They | do |
|
not, for the most part, exist to do |
| |
things that image editors can’t, but |
| |
instead to do specific things better |
| |
and faster than |
| |
Whatever you want to do, if you’re |
| |
using Photoshop, there’s probably a |
| |
solution you could hammer out, but if |
| |
that takes a lot of time and |
| |
and you’re short on both, try a |
| |
So, say, if you’ve been trying to |
| |
figure out how to mix channels to |
| |
convert color to |
| |
process that can be both tedious and |
| |
boring), nik’s Color Efex Pro filter set |
| |
including the | Software | |
in that can do it. |
| |
verter could be the answer. Or if you |
|
need to make
77