
Table 31 Difference Between 3DC Sync/CAJ and 3DC CAJ/CAJ Replication (continued)
3DC Sync/CAJ replication | 3DC CAJ/CAJ replication |
Suitable for applications where data currency is more | Suitable for the |
important and the performance can be sustained. | performance with synchronous replication can not be |
| sustained. |
|
|
Higher cost for inter site links in Metrocluster as it requires | Comparatively lower cost for inter site links as it can work |
low latency and high bandwidth. | with even high latency and low bandwidth. |
The 3DC Sync/CAJ and 3DC CAJ/CAJ replications can coexist in the 3DC DR Solution for different applications. Both 3DC Sync/CAJ and 3DC CAJ/CAJ replication can be implemented with either two or three links between the three data centers. The two link configuration is called as
In a
•Continuous Access Synchronous data replication is established to replicate data between the arrays at Site1 and Site2 when using 3DC Sync/CAJ replication. Continuous Access Journal data replication is established to replicate data between the arrays at Site1 and Site2 when using 3DC CAJ/CAJ replication.
•Continuous Access Journal data replication must be established between one of the arrays located in the Metrocluster - Site1 or Site2 - and the array located at Site3. This replication pair is used to replicate data to Site3 actively and will be referred as
•A Delta Resync pair is configured over the remaining data replication link between Site1 or Site2 and the array located at Site3. The Delta Resync pair is a suspended journal volume, which can be resynchronized to replicate data to Site3 in case of data not being replicated to Site3 using the
In a
Figure 64 (page 416) shows the
Overview of 3DC DR Solution 415