JVC VR-N100U Comparison MPEG4 vs MJPEG, Enterprise Client Software (1 of 6)

End-to-End IP Video Solution

Comparison – MPEG4 vs MJPEGComparison – MPEG4 vs MJPEG

•Stream of Inter-Framed Images (I,B,P

frames = Group Of Pictures)

• Easil y Corruptible Video (Seconds-to-

Minutes) due to Dropped Network Packets

• Video Must Be Encoded From Source

and Decoded for Viewing

• Requir es 3~4Mbps to Deliver Quality

Streams for Video Analysis & Surveillance

• Unabl e to Decode Multiple Streams due

to Heavy CPU Requirements

CONCLUSION:

Good for Broadcasting Application

(e.g. Internet) where Video Continuity

and Integrity are NOTCritical

• Continu ous Stream of Indepe ndent and

Complete Video Images

• Data Integrit y During Transmission and

on Storage Medium

• Video is Nev er Manipulated from

Source (No Encode/Decode Needed)

• Q ualit y Video is Achieved at Lower

Bandwidths with Self-Contained Images

• Client Re quires Minimum Processing

Power to View Multiple (e.g. 16) Streams

CONCLUSION:

Good for Security (e.g. Airport) where

Video Clarity, Integrity and Reliability

are EXTREMELY CRITICAL

End-to-End IP Video Solution

Enterprise Client Software (1 of 6)Enterprise Client Software (1 of 6)

Application

• ZView Software

• Windows 2000/XP-based Enterprise Client Software

• Alternative to Using Your Web Browser Only

Software License

• JVC Includes Unlimited User License for ZViewApplication with Each

VR-N100U

Usage

• Powerful Enterprise Management Tool

• Applicable for All Level of Users (Viewers, Operat ors, Administrators)

• Virtualization of All VR-N100U and Cameras From a Single Interface

• Supports Automatic Bridging of Subnets

• TAB Display Options are Fully Configurable to Better Match User Type