Cisco Systems OL-12518-01 manual Using VRF VPNs, Mpls VPN for Storage Architecture

Page 19

Chapter 4 FCIP over IP/MPLS Core

MPLS VPN Core

Figure 4-9 MPLS VPN for Storage Architecture

 

SAN 9216

 

1 14+2

 

 

 

 

VRF SAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

spse 7606-60

 

 

 

1/1

 

 

1/2

 

 

 

 

GE

 

 

GE

2/1

 

 

2/2

GSR12410

 

 

 

2/3

 

 

2/4

 

 

GE

GE

1/1

 

 

1/2

 

 

 

 

 

spse 7609-46

 

 

 

2/1

 

 

 

2/4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VRF SAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAN 9216

 

1 14+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAN 9216

1 14+2

VRF SAN

spse 7609-45

1/1 1/2

GE

2/1 2/2

GSR12410

2/3 2/4

GE GE

2/1 2/2

spse 12408-51

VRF SAN 2/3

1 14+2

132426

SAN 9216

 

Multiple storage customers can be supported on the same MPLS network. Customer 1 cannot see the customer 2 network because there are separate VPN routing/forwarding (VRF) tables for each customer.

Using VRF VPNs

A VRF VPN tunnel is built to provide a secure, managed network between the storage devices. In addition, MPLS VRF VPNs provide distinct advantages for transporting multicast FCIP. VRF VPNs also provide scalability, performance, and stability of the system.

MPLS VPNs use Multiprotocol Border Gateway Protocol MP-BGP) between the provider edge (PE) routers to facilitate the routes between storage VPN areas. MPLS forwarding is used to carry the packets across the backbone. PE routers can use multiple routing and forwarding instances. BGP propagates reachability information for VPN-IPv4 prefixes among PE routers using MP-BGP. This ensures that the routes for a given VPN are learned only by other members of that VPN, enabling members of the VPN to communicate with each other.

When a VPN route learned from a customer edge (CE) router is injected into BGP, a list of VPN route-target extended-community attributes is associated with it. Typically, the list of route-target community values is set from an export list of route targets associated with the VRF from which the route was learned. Based on the routing information stored in the VRF IP routing table and the VRF Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF) table, packets are forwarded to their destination using MPLS. A PE router binds a label to each customer prefix learned from a CE router and includes the label in the network reachability information for the prefix that it advertises to other PE routers.

 

 

Data Center High Availability Clusters Design Guide

 

 

 

 

 

 

OL-12518-01

 

 

4-19

 

 

 

 

 

Image 19
Contents A P T E R OverviewSAN Extension Through SP Network Typical Customer RequirementsCompression Support in Cisco MDS CompressionCompression Modes and Rate 2shows a comparison of the Cisco compression solutionsSecurity Cisco Compression SolutionsVPNSM-DES, 3DES MDS MPS-DES, 3DES, AES192 Cisco Encryption SolutionsWrite Acceleration Using Fcip Tape AccelerationTCP Parameters TCP OperationsTCP Maximum Bandwidth TCP Window SizeTCP Minimum Available Bandwidth Round Trip Time CiscoIPS Module Cisco Fcip Cisco MDSCPE Selection-Choosing between the 9216i Multiprotocol Services ModuleQoS Requirements in Fcip Synchronous Replication ApplicationsAsynchronous Replication Service Offering Scenario A-Disaster Recovery Service Offerings over Fcip Fcip over SP IP/MPLS Core for Disaster Recovery Solutions Service Offering Scenario B-Connecting Multiple SitesSP Mpls Service Offering Scenario C-Host-based MirroringCPE Mpls VPN CoreMpls VPN for Storage Architecture Using VRF VPNsLab Setup and Topology Testing Scenarios and ResultsTest Objectives MP BGP Configuration-PE1 VPN VRF-Specific ConfigurationsGigabit Ethernet Interface Configuration-PE2 Gigabit Ethernet Interface Configuration-PE1VRF Configuration-PE1 MP BGP Configuration-PE2Scenario 1-MDS 9216i Connection to GSR Mpls Core VRF Configuration-PE2Configuring the MTU Configuring TCP Parameters on CPE Cisco MDSThroughput Scenario 2-Latency Across the GSR Mpls CoreScenario 3-Cisco MDS 9216i Connection to Cisco 7500 PE/GSR P Scenario 5-Impact of Core Performance Scenario 4-Impact of Failover in the Core17shows the MDS Fcip and compression latency Compression Ratio Comparisons Application RequirementsConclusion Remote Tape-Backup Applications