Patton electronic 2888 manual Solution Description, Unique Selling Position, Top FAQs

Page 2

Product Brief

Solution Description

As enterprise IT managers leverage the convergence of voice, video and data over Ethernet, the need to transport Ethernet over the WAN at speeds greater than a single T1/E1 increases. Avoid switching to an expensive T3/E3 circuit, transitioning to an unproven Ethernet based WAN service or spending endless hours configuring IP routing redundancy. Use the Model 2888 to bond multiple T1/E1 circuits and increase point-to-point Ethernet bandwidth without overcomplicating configurations or sacrificing resiliency.

Problem

Issue

Impact

Our Solution

 

 

T1/E1 alternatives

Stick with well-known &

Need faster

A single T1/E1 is not

introduce cost, risk,

reliableT1/E1 circuits and

point-to-point

complexity and are

bond them together for

fast enough any more

connections

not available

maximum bandwidth

 

 

 

everywhere

 

Complex Router

Configuring IP load

Increases risk router

Simplify by bridging

Ethernet traffic over the

Configurations

balancing is complex

is misconfigured

WAN

 

 

 

Prioritizing some

Real-time applications

Without active QoS

Apply active layer 2/3 QoS

need dedicated

voice and video

and guarantee applications

applications over

bandwidth and higher

applications will be

the bandwidth they need

others

priority

unusable

 

 

 

Unique Selling Position

The IpLink™ Model 2888 Multi-Megabit Inverse Mux increases point-to-point Ethernet/IP bandwidth over standard T1/E1 circuits, reducing configuration complexity, and providing active QoS for real-time application requirements.

Top FAQs

Q. If all my traffic is IP why should I use Ethernet bridging?

A. The other alternative, configuring a router for load-balancing can be a difficult task. First of all, a router can load balance outbound traffic only. To get bidirectional load balancing requires complex configuration at both ends. Secondly, both routers must be configured to assign the same administrative distance and cost to a destination. Lastly, load balancing at the IP packet layer creates a situation where packets can reach the destination out of order, creating a problem for streaming media such as video. By using Ethernet bridging and relying on ML-PPP, the configuration is simplified and the out of order packet problem eliminated.

Q. What happens if one of my T1/E1 fails, does my entire link go down?

A. No, with ML-PPP, if a T1/E1 goes down, the Ethernet traffic will continue to flow across the active links. When the failed link comes back up, full bandwidth is automatically restored without manual intervention.

Q. Does the Inverse Mux use ATM to multiplex the T1/E1 circuits?

A. No. The Inverse Mux uses Multi-Link PPP (ML-PPP) which is 18% more efficient than ATM when using 256 byte packets. Efficiency increases further with packet sizes of over 1,000 bytes which are typically used by streaming video.

Q. Does the IpLink™ Inverse Mux support VLANs?

A. Yes. The Inverse Mux can be configured to apply QoS based on VLAN tags as well as tag untagged VLAN traffic. It can likewise transparently pass VLAN, Cisco ISL and MAC-in-MAC (PBB) frames as well as MPLS tagged traffic.

Page 2 of 2

Image 2
Contents Product Description Enterprise WAN Access SolutionsFeature Benefit Summary Who is it for?If all my traffic is IP why should I use Ethernet bridging? Solution DescriptionTop FAQs Unique Selling Position
Related manuals
Manual 2 pages 20.53 Kb