Meeting a key backhaul challenge – the rapid growth of multimedia traffic
To remain competitive in the rapidly changing mobile marketplace, operators need to deliver profitable new services while reducing backhaul costs. Users are expanding their demands beyond basic voice and data services like instant messaging and email; they want more
However, backhaul networks must also evolve to meet these new band- width demands at acceptable cost points. IP transport offers a valuable solution to help operators transform networks and better manage growing broadband traffic.
The
the connectivity of Ethernet and legacy T1 base stations. As a result, the network can easily and efficiently accommodate rapid growth in multimedia traffic, with smooth migration from TDM to IP.
Native transport of packet traffic produces a clear gain in scarce radio resources; while packet solutions can absorb TDM traffic efficiently, TDM solutions cannot handle packet traffic
Figure 1 compares TDM transport and packet aggregation.
Figure 1. TDM transport versus packet aggregation
2G
3G
Cell Site |
|
|
2G |
|
|
3G |
| Overlay of Multiple Traffic |
|
| |
TDM Radio | TDM NxE1 | TDM |
Node |
| NxE1 |
Cell Site |
|
|
| ATM NxE1 |
|
| Ethernet |
|
|
| E1 Stacking |
Cell Site |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aggregated Packet Traffic |
| Packet | TDM NxE1 | Packets |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
Cell Site | Radio Node |
|
|
| ATM NxE1 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Ethernet | “Data Aware” |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Packet Aggregation |