Performance Comparison
9 vs. | |
|
Advantages of 12-Blade Wheels
5SBEJUJPOBMDFOUSJGVHBMXIFFMTVUJMJ[FCMBEFXIFFMEFTJHOT8IJMFUIFJS performance is adequate, recent industry trends have seen the emergence of
Model QEM and QEP plenum fans feature a
Greenheck’s
formed aluminum blades. The two performance examples below demonstrate the superior performance of the
4J[F1FSGPSNBODF$SJUFSJBPG$'.!JOXH
8IFFM | RPM | #SBLF | Motor | Static | LwA | |
Type | HP | HP Size | Eff. | |||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#MBEF | 2607 | 7.76 | 10 | 96 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#MBEF | 2400 | 6.37 | 90 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4J[F1FSGPSNBODF$SJUFSJBPG$'.!JOXH
8IFFM | RPM | #SBLF | Motor | Static | LwA | |
Type | HP | HP Size | Eff. | |||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#MBEF | 1469 | 26.9 | 30 | 96 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#MBEF | 1416 | 23.9 | 92 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Performance
Figure 1 plots the fan performance and efficiency of two fans running at the same rpm. Increased wheel efficiency allows the 12-bladed fan to produce more airflow while using less energy.
Sound Performance
Figures 2 and 3 show the inlet and outlet sound spectrums for the size 33 unit used in the above performance comparison.
Lower Sound Power (LwA)
The overall
Easy to Attenuate
High sound power levels in the first and second octave bands are difficult to attenuate. The
Improved Sound Quality
A sound spectrum with a dominant tone can be annoying to a listener. Greenheck’s
Air Performance Comparison
Size 33 @ 1400 RPM
|
|
|
|
| RPM |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| Efficiency |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80% |
wg) | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 70% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 60% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
(in. | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50% |
Pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Static | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 |
Volume (cfm x 1000)
Figure 1
Inlet Sound Comparison - Size 33
(dB) | 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | LwA |
Octave Band
Figure 2
Outlet Sound Comparison - Size 33
|
(dB) | 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | LwA |
Octave Band
Figure 3
Static Efficiency
3