section 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| hp storage white paper | |||||||||
Every LUN would have 30 spindles at its disposal. | for more details. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
And don’t forget, in the virtual array the spare | Question: Shouldn’t a good system administrator | |||||||||||||||
disk capacity is also | spread | across all of the | know which RAID level the data is in? With the | |||||||||||||
spindles, i.e., there are no unused spindles in an | virtual array, I have no idea if it is in1RAID 5 or | |||||||||||||||
HP Virtual Array. |
|
|
|
|
| RAID 1+0. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Second, the virtual array automatically performance | Short answer: Both the HP Surestore Virtual | |||||||||||||||
Array 7100 and the HP Surestore Virtual Array | ||||||||||||||||
tunes the array 24 hours per day, 365 days per | ||||||||||||||||
7400 can be configured to run in either fixed | ||||||||||||||||
year. The RAID level is matched with the workload. | ||||||||||||||||
Data with access patterns that would benefit | RAID 1+0 or AutoRAID modes. And to help with | |||||||||||||||
from RAID 1+0 storage are automatically directed | performance analysis, the controller can provide | |||||||||||||||
to a RAID 1+0 section of the array. Infrequently | data on the actual usage of each RAID level. | |||||||||||||||
used data, or data whose access patterns match | Long answer: With the HP Virtual Array, if | |||||||||||||||
RAID 5DP performance characteristics, are | your data is frequently used, it WILL be in RAID | |||||||||||||||
directed to the RAID 5DP section of the array. | 1+0 and will have the best performance. The | |||||||||||||||
These are the same rules that a storage expert | virtual array RAID level policies were developed | |||||||||||||||
would use to optimize an application’s performance. | after researching | the | decision patterns of | |||||||||||||
In addition, like an expert storage administrator, | experienced | system |
| and | database | |||||||||||
any changes to the configuration are made only |
| |||||||||||||||
administrators. | Almost | always, | technology | |||||||||||||
during | or | when disks | are | |||||||||||||
progresses | from | highly | manual | to highly | ||||||||||||
added. | Note: When | disks | are | added, | the | |||||||||||
automated operations. In almost every case, the | ||||||||||||||||
existing LUNs are automatically extended across | ||||||||||||||||
developers of automation simply replicate the best | ||||||||||||||||
the new | disks. This | normally requires | data | |||||||||||||
of the already | developed | manual | processes. | |||||||||||||
movement | within | the | array. | However, | ||||||||||||
This is exactly what HP did with the HP Virtual | ||||||||||||||||
administrators have the option to postpone this | ||||||||||||||||
Array. Also please note: The Virtual Array | ||||||||||||||||
data movement by simply turning off the array’s | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| policies are improved over those of the Model | |||||||||||
faqs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12H. The virtual array really does strive in almost | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| every instance to do any background data | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| movement during periods of low array activity. | ||||||||
Question: Isn’t this virtualization technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
new and doesn’t that make it risky and untried? | Question: On which disks is my data kept? I | |||||||||||||||
Answer: It would be new for HP’s competitors, | suppose the virtual array can be trusted to handle | |||||||||||||||
the RAID level decisions, but I also need to know | ||||||||||||||||
but HP has been virtualizing arrays since 1995, | ||||||||||||||||
on which disks my indexes and redo logs are | ||||||||||||||||
and since then HP has sold over 20,000 virtualized | ||||||||||||||||
kept. The way the virtual array moves data and | ||||||||||||||||
arrays. The technology is neither new nor risky | ||||||||||||||||
and it offers a simple and compelling value | stripes across all the disks means I have no idea | |||||||||||||||
proposition, i.e., great ease of management and | where my data is kept. |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
great data protection. For arrays, management | Answer: First, if you are worried about the | |||||||||||||||
costs are far more costly than the initial purchase | integrity of your data, the HP Virtual Array does | |||||||||||||||
price. The HP virtual array is the easiest array in the | a combination of things to protect your data that | |||||||||||||||
world to configure, add capacity, and manage— | ||||||||||||||||
no other array does. First, the HP Virtual Array | ||||||||||||||||
the administration savings are significant. It also | ||||||||||||||||
offers | checksum, ECC | protected | ||||||||||||||
has the best availability of any | ||||||||||||||||
memory, parity coherence, disk scrubbing, and | ||||||||||||||||
on the | market. See | the | white | paper | titled | |||||||||||
RAID 5DP | which, | in a | typical configuration, | |||||||||||||
“VA7100 Hardware High Availability Features” | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6