Kodak I780 - page 5

Test Job 1 Test Job 2 Test Job 3 Test Job 4 Test Job 5 Test Job 6

i780 ISIS driver, main,

cropping Aggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressive Aggressive

i780 ISIS driver, main,

thresholding iThresholding iThresholding iThresholding iThresholding iThresholding iThresholding

i780 ISIS driver, main,

contrast 0 0 0 0 0 0

i780 ISIS driver, layout,

image orientation (both front

and back image #1)

Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic

i780 ISIS driver, layout, page

orientation (both front and

back image #1)

Top edge ﬁrst Top edge ﬁrst Top edge ﬁrst Top edge ﬁrst Top edge ﬁrst Top edge ﬁrst

i780 ISIS driver, scanner,

document feeder

250—Automatically

start transport

250—Automatically

start transport

250—Automatically

start transport

250—Automatically

start transport

250—Automatically

start transport

250—Automatically

start transport

i780 ISIS driver, scanner,

ultrasonic detection

Medium—

3 sensors—end job

Medium—

3 sensors—end job

Medium—

3 sensors—end job

Medium—

3 sensors—end job

Medium—

3 sensors—end job

Medium—

3 sensors—end job

i780 ISIS driver, dropout,

blank image detection

Black and White

(back only)—2KB

Black and White

(back only)—2KB

Black and White

(back only)—2KB

Color (back only)—

125KB

Color (back only)—

125KB

Color (back only)—

125KB

i780 ISIS driver, image

processing, JPEG quality N/A N/A N/A Good Good Good

i780 ISIS driver, image

processing, color correction N/A N/A N/A Text with pictures Text with pictures Text with pictures

* Note: The Canon DR-X10C Scanner conﬁgurations were modeled as closely as possible to the Kodak i780 Scanner set-ups.

Return to Speed and throughput ➡

Table of Contents ➡

Contents

Main Competitive BenChmarking Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Table of Contents Speed and throughput Appendix 1Testing methodology and results for speed and throughput Throughput tests Test # Chart 1Throughput testing Chart 2Data and dierences on number of pages scanned in one hour Chart 3Graphic representation of data and dierences on number of pages scanned in one hour Reference ATesting conguration details* For more information about testing methodology and Return to Speed and throughput Page Image and data integrity Appendix 2Testing methodology and results for image and data integrity (OCR read rates) Image and data integritycomplete testing results Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Sensor durability Count on Kodak for consistent and true performance. Conclusions Kodak i780 Scanner vs. Canon DR-X10C Scanner Misfeed management Count on Kodak for consistent and true performance. Page Appendix 3Part AMisfeed managementTesting methodology and results Misfeed managementtest results Multifeed productivity test Challenging document productivity test Appendix 3Part BMisfeed managementJob stream congurations Multifeed productivity test Challenge document productivity test Challenge document productivity test, continued Appendix 3Part CMisfeedmanagementWorkstationcongurations Appendix 3Part DMisfeed managementScanner features and settings prole Page Page Page Page Page Real-world environment (Mixed Batches/Transport/Reliability/ SurePath/Dust Detection) Page Appendix 4Part AReal-world environmentTesting methodology and results Misfeed managementtest results Multifeed productivity test Challenging document productivity test Appendix 4Part BReal-world environmentJob stream congurations For more information about testing methodology and laboratory test results, click here Multifeed productivity test Challenge document productivity test Challenge document productivity test, continued Appendix 4Part CReal-worldenvironmentWorkstationcongurations Appendix 4Part DReal-world environmentScanner features and settings prole Page Page Page Page Page Appendix 5Real-world environmentTesting methodology and results (dust and contaminants) Page Appendix 5Real-world environmentTesting methodology and results (dust and contaminants), continued Test #2Determine dust particle size to trigger DR-X10C Dust Detection System detailed results Overall testing conclusion