Plug-In Interface Cards

All SATO Industrial Printers use Plug-In Interface Cards for maximum flexibility. They can be easily changed in the field in a matter of seconds to accommodate any of the commonly used host interfaces.

IEEE1284 - High-Speed Parallel

Connector:

Standard Centronics 36 Pin (Female)

Transmission Speed:

Up to 450k bytes per second

Port Type Compatibility:

ECP/Bi-Directional compatible

Printer Cable Type: IEEE1284 Compliant Parallel (Cable not included)

Max. Printer Cable Length:

10 feet (3 meters)

USB*

Connector:

USB Type B

Transmission Speed:

1.5 Mbps

Printer Cable Type:

USB Type A Male to USB Type B Male (Cable not included)

Max. Printer Cable Length:

10 feet (3 meters)

*Factory Installation Required

RS232 - High-Speed

RS422/485

Serial Interfaces

Connector:

Standard DB-25S (Female)

Settings via dip switch on the board:

Baud Rates: 9600, 19200, 38400, 57600

Communication Protocols:

Ready/Busy, Xon/Xoff, SATO Status 2, 3 and 4

Printer Cable Type:

NULL MODEM cable when connected to a standard PC RS232C port. (Cable not included)

Max. Printer Cable Length:

50 feet at up to 19,200 baud rate. Determined by cable quality and baud rate. Refer to the ANSI/EIA RS232C spec for more info

Connector:

2 Standard DB-9 (Female); Supports Multi-Drop of up to 32 printers

Settings via dip switch on the board: Baud Rates: 2400, 4800, 9600, 19200 Parity: ODD, EVEN, NONE

Stop Bits: 1 or 2 / Data Bits: 7 to 8

Communication Protocols: Ready/Busy, Xon/Xoff, SATO Status 3

Printer Cable Type: RS422/485 Standard Cable (Cable not included)

Max. Printer Cable Length:

3,900 Feet

www.satoamerica.com

Page 1
Image 1
SATO WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK, WEP, EAP-LEAP, EAP-TLS manual IEEE1284 High-Speed Parallel, Serial Interfaces

EAP-TLS, EAP-LEAP, IEEE1284, WEP, WPA-PSK specifications

SATO EAP-TLS, WPA-PSK, WEP, WPA2-PSK, and EAP-LEAP are critical components in wireless network security, each characterized by distinct features, technologies, and methodologies.

EAP-TLS (Extensible Authentication Protocol - Transport Layer Security) is one of the most secure wireless authentication protocols. It employs digital certificates for device and server authentication, ensuring that both parties in the communication are legitimate. EAP-TLS provides mutual authentication, which means both the client and server verify each other's authenticity. This protocol is highly resistant to several attacks, making it suitable for corporate environments where security is paramount. However, the management of digital certificates can be cumbersome, requiring a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) setup.

WPA-PSK (Wi-Fi Protected Access - Pre-Shared Key) is a simpler and widely adopted security protocol commonly found in home and small business networks. With WPA-PSK, users share a single pre-defined password to connect to the network. While WPA-PSK enhances security over its predecessor, WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy), and employs TKIP (Temporal Key Integrity Protocol) for encryption, it is still vulnerable to dictionary attacks if weak passwords are used.

WEP, one of the first wireless security protocols, provides minimal security through static keys and RC4 encryption. However, WEP has numerous vulnerabilities, such as weak key management and susceptibility to packet sniffing and replay attacks. As a result, it is generally considered insecure and unsuitable for modern wireless networking.

WPA2-PSK, an improvement over WPA, includes Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) for stronger encryption, making it much more secure than both WEP and WPA-PSK. WPA2-PSK retains the same pre-shared key mechanism, making it user-friendly for home networks, while providing significantly enhanced data protection. The introduction of AES makes WPA2-PSK a trusted standard for securing personal and business networks.

EAP-LEAP (Lightweight EAP) is a Cisco-supported authentication method that uses dynamic WEP keys for securing wireless communications. It allows users to authenticate with a username and password, but is less secure compared to EAP-TLS and WPA2-PSK due to vulnerabilities that enable replay and dictionary attacks. Organizations that have Cisco infrastructure often use EAP-LEAP, though its adoption has declined in favor of stronger protocols.

In summary, the evolution of these wireless security protocols reflects the growing need for secure communication. EAP-TLS is favored for its robust security in enterprise environments, while WPA2-PSK is widely accepted for its balance of security and usability in home networks. Conversely, WEP and EAP-LEAP are increasingly seen as insufficient for today’s security requirements.