to the user or installer to be connected or disconnected as desired. However repeat- ed field testing found that floating pin 1 on these outputs was the key to maintaining quiet audio. From Fenway Park, to the Orange Bowl, and then northwest to Husk- er Stadium, lifting pin 1 always did the trick.
A simple solution is available if an applica- tion does require that a ground be avail- able on the main and
Intercom Channel Crosstalk
By the very nature of its design, a
There are several ways of reducing inter- com channel crosstalk. Probably the easi- est way is to use cable pairs that are not
twisted. Twisted pairs are great for differ- ential (balanced) signals, but not so great for unbalanced transmission. This is gen- erally because the more twists in a pair the greater the effective cable capacitance.
In a stadium or arena setting, choosing standard “telco” pairs may actually work better than
Another option is to use two cable pairs for each intercom circuit. If the pairs are not shielded the wiring is simple. Common would be connected to one side of each pair, and then signal from each channel would connect to the other side of the pairs. If the pairs also contain shields the wiring could be done somewhat differ- ently. One option is to connect common to both cable shields, intercom channel 1 (DC with audio) to one full pair, and inter- com channel 2 to the second full pair. A better option might be to have common connect to both shields and one side of the pair that serves channel 2.
Intercom Audio Levels
The Model 233 was designed to function well with intercom lines associated with standard broadcast and production “party- line” intercom systems. These systems provide DC power and one or two chan- nels of audio over standard
in Studio Technologies’ lab, the nominal RTS
Model 233 User Guide | Issue 1, September 2007 |
Studio Technologies, Inc. | Page 35 |