HP Gesture manual Spatial mapping of gestures, Layout, Feedback

Page 5

3.2Spatial mapping of gestures

In order to limit the technological complexity of recognition and thereby trying to reduce instances of errors, we have mapped the gestures on the coordinates of the writing space. This means that the number of elements that needs to be recognized has been reduced. The same gestures made in different areas of the pad produce different combinations wherein the consonant is selected using the spatial mapping and the modifiers are assigned after recognition of the gestures.

3.3Layout

The Varnmala structure was useful for people to locate keys and to reduce the cognitive load. Even users who had ‘forgotten’ the alphabetical order could remember the local sequence of the letters they were searching for. For example, if they were looking for the (n) key, they would mutter an entire line of consonants ‘(t) (th) (d) (dh) (n)’ before locating the key. (Chand et al. 2004)

Figure 3: Varnmala layout

We tried to design the gesture keypad as cognitively easy for a novice user as possible, so that with minute training and instructions they are able to achieve a decent writing speed. We kept the layout very basic, as it appears in the Devnagari varnmala books in the block.

3.4Feedback

Performance data with keyboards, where the auditory feedback can be switched on and off suggest that typing is significantly faster and more accurate with auditory feedback on than with off. (Birdwell, Monty & Snyder, 1983; Blake, Muto & Roe, 1984) Based on these prior studies we added a click sound on every pen down. This can be again toggled on and off based on user’s preference. The timings of the feedback and the frequency of sound are still to be investigated.

In addition visual feedback has been provided so that the user can see his handwritten input on the tablet real-time. We believe that expert users of the system will not use this functionality much but it should be provided to help the novice users. With some errors always built in with this keyboard due to handwriting recognition and pen tilt errors users may be able to catch and correct their errors when they see their handwriting on the computer screen.

Image 5
Contents Page Abstract KeywordsIntroduction Difference with roman script Issues with using an Inscript KeyboardNeed for a Devnagari input device Gestures Introduction to the GKBFeedback Spatial mapping of gesturesLayout Scalable solution for multi lingual environment Deleting using the GKBFinalizing keys and layout size Technology usedObjective User studyMethod SubjectsAnalysis Evaluation methodSize in mms Top Strip Size Plot Final layout ResultsFuture Directions and discussions ConclusionsAcknowledgements References