HP ProCurve Routing Switch 9308M / 9304M Reviewer’s Guide
For 100 Mbps environments, the crosspoint matrix backplane can handle the traffic at full wire speed. In this situation the traffic is limited by the total throughput of the 100 Mbps ports.
3.2 Congestion Control
Congestion occurs any time more packets are destined for a particular segment than that segment can handle. All switches handle momentary congestion passively through buffering excess packets in memory. The HP ProCurve Routing Switch 9304M and HP ProCurve Routing Switch 9308M handle the congestion issue largely through running at full media speed. The only congestion the routing switches need handle are packets destined for output ports that are congested due to external network segment congestion. For this momentary situation, shared memory on the modules is used. Each module has between 2 and 8 MB of shared memory, depending on the port type of the module.
Another standardized method to control congestion in a multiple network box environment is with the 802.3x Flow Control standard. The HP ProCurve routing switches support the 802.3x standard. Orderly control of segment traffic occurs because a port on the routing switch can signal its congestion to the segment, holding off segment traffic. For 802.3u to work correctly, the node(s) connected directly to routing switch ports with flow control enabled also have to support the flow control protocol. Flow control in the routing switches would only have to be used if the network segments external to the routing switches were congested.
In the past, some switches have implemented a
3.2.1 Head-of-line-blocking
A particular type of congestion that can be seen in some network devices is
3.2.2 Bi-directional Congestion Testing (X-Stream)
Another congestion test currently being used is the
While this is an ardent stress test, the HP ProCurve routing switches handle it with little problem because of the
3.3 Latency
Latency is the amount of time the switch takes to process a packet. In
To add to the confusion, many testing houses report
©1999 | Revision 4.0 – 4/1/1999 | Page: 22 of 27 |