Arbitration for Data Integrity in Serviceguard Clusters

Summary

Summary

This paper has described a number of approaches to arbitration to provide safety for data in high availability clusters. There are advantages and disadvantages to each of the major approaches using a lock disk, a quorum server, or arbitrator nodes.

Table 1

Comparison of Different Arbitration Methods

 

 

 

Arbitration

Advantages

Disadvantages

Mode

 

 

 

 

 

Lock Disk

• Does not require a

• Requires separate disk hardware

 

separate system.

that must be cabled to all nodes.

 

• Disk can be used for

• Can only be used with clusters up

 

other purposes as well.

to 4 nodes.

 

• Legacy method that has

• Not available on Linux.

 

been used for many

• Acquiring the lock follows an

 

years.

 

arbitration protocol, and this adds

 

 

 

 

to failover time.

 

 

• Use in extended distance clusters

 

 

requires dual lock disks, with a

 

 

slight risk of split brain.

 

 

 

Lock LUN

• Does not require a

• Requires separate disk hardware

 

separate system.

that must be cabled to all nodes.

 

• Disk can be used for

• Can only be used with clusters up

 

other purposes as well.

to 4 nodes.

 

• Similar to HP-UX lock

• Acquiring the lock follows an

 

disk.

arbitration protocol, and this adds

 

 

to failover time.

 

 

• Dual lock LUNs are not

 

 

supported, including extended

 

 

clusters.

 

 

 

30

Page 30
Image 30
HP Serviceguard manual Summary, Comparison of Different Arbitration Methods, Arbitration Advantages Disadvantages Mode