REV

REV

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

COM

STOP

CLOSE

OPEN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

ENTRAPMENT PROTECTION DEVICES WIRING INSTRUCTIONS

Note A: Connect only one (1) approved entrap-

ment protection device to terminals “Photo” and “Com”. If additional entrapment protection is desired

connect additional photoelectric and door edges devices to “NC REV”, “NO REV” and “COM” terminals as

shown here.

SAFE FINISH PHOTOBEAM

Any Miller Edge ME, MT/MU, and CPT family of edges, must be connected to the SM-102 Edge Module, Recognized by UL as per UL325 2010 on 08-29-2010.

See Note A to the left.

 

MOTOR

Figure 9

CONTROL

BOARD

 

3-WIRE PHOTOBEAM

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPEN

CLOSE

STOP

 

 

 

 

TB1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COM

24 VAC

ILOCK

SINGLE

COM

PHOTO

NC REV

NO REV

COM

STOP

CLOSE

OPEN

Linear Approved

Emitter

Photoelectric

Detector

Part #

Entrapment

Part #

217792

Protection Device

217800

 

See Note A above

 

3-WIRE PHOTOBEAM

3 Wire Photoelectric Entrapment Protection Device wiring. Note: This device can be used for additional Entrapment protection but connection of this device will not enable the Momentary Contact to Open Mode.

2 Wire Door Edge

Protection Device wiring. Note: This device can be used for additional Entrapment protection but connection of this device will not enable the Momentary Contact to Open Mode.

Note: When adding a photocell device with a Normally Closed output remove the factory installed jumper from the connection terminals.

Door Edge and Photoelectric Wiring

After properly connecting an approved Entrapment Protection Device (see above and Page 3) to the operator, see Page 15 for setting of the selector switches. These switches must be properly set and an approved photoelectric device or approved door edge device connected to the operator to obtain B2 Mode of Operation, Momentary Contact to Close.

Page 13
Image 13
Linear H-S, J-S owner manual Entrapment Protection Devices Wiring Instructions, Board

H-S, J-S specifications

Linear J-S and H-S are two prominent approaches in the realm of signal processing, particularly focusing on data compression and transmission efficiency. They provide robust methodologies for managing data in systems where bandwidth and storage are critical factors.

Linear J-S, or Linear Jordan-Space signal processing, is characterized by its ability to utilize linear transformations to represent signal variations with minimal loss of information. The main feature of this approach lies in its capacity to maintain high fidelity in signals while significantly reducing bandwidth consumption. By employing linear transformations, such as Fourier or wavelet transforms, Linear J-S efficiently captures the essential components of a signal. This methodology is particularly useful in scenarios involving audio and video data, where maintaining quality during compression is paramount.

One significant technology underpinning Linear J-S is the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), which allows for rapid computation of the frequency components of a signal. This enables real-time processing and enhances the performance of systems that rely on rapid data transmission. Another critical aspect of Linear J-S is its adaptability to various data types, making it suitable for applications in telecommunications, multimedia, and even biomedical engineering.

On the other hand, Linear H-S, or Linear Harmonic-Skew signal processing, takes a different approach by focusing on harmonic analysis. This technique examines the harmonic content of signals to develop models that can accurately reconstruct the original data from its compressed form. The primary feature of Linear H-S is its robust handling of periodic signals, which allows for accurate representation even in the presence of noise.

Linear H-S technologies often leverage Adaptive Filter Theory and the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), which are effective in minimizing artifacts and preserving the integrity of the signal. This makes Linear H-S highly applicable in areas like image processing, where it plays a critical role in JPEG compression, ensuring that the visual quality remains intact without unnecessarily large file sizes.

Both Linear J-S and H-S employ algorithms designed for optimal reconstruction of signals from their compressed forms, emphasizing the need for low latency in applications where speed is crucial. They each have their unique characteristics, making them suitable for different types of signals and applications. While Linear J-S excels in the realm of audio and complex data types, Linear H-S proves to be invaluable in scenarios involving repetitive patterns and periodic signals.

In conclusion, Linear J-S and H-S represent two sophisticated methodologies in signal processing, each with distinct features and technologies designed to optimize data compression while faithfully preserving signal quality. Their applications span across various industries, showcasing their importance in contemporary data communication and multimedia systems.