|
|
|
|
|
|
| Features in |
|
|
| 8 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR | Module | Level | Description | AR400 | AR7x5 | AR750S / AR770S |
| Rapier i |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00012613 | Firewall | 2 | When the WAN load balancer was used with IP NAT (instead of firewall NAT), and | Y | - | Y |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
|
|
| an FTP session was established to a server on the public network, the router did |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| not correctly establish a return session. This meant data was unable to flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| correctly back from the server, and the router rebooted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Note that the WAN load balancer is not designed for use with IP NAT, because IP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NATs are not associated with interfaces. Configurations that use an IP NAT cannot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| vary the global IP address (the gblip parameter) based on the outgoing interface, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| so the WAN load balancer sends all traffic out with the same source address. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Therefore, the return traffic probably comes back via the WAN load balancer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| resource that is associated with the global IP. The impact is that the WAN load |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| balancer balances the outgoing traffic but not the return traffic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| We recommend using firewall NAT instead of IP NAT with the WAN load balancer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00012624 | VRRP, | 2 | Under certain network conditions in which VRRP entities become temporarily | Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y | Y |
| IP Gateway |
| unsynchronised, the router or switch could receive a gratuitous ARP from a self- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| elected VRRP master when the router or switch was still the master. This caused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| the existing master to create an ARP entry that incorrectly redirected packets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| towards the other VRRP entity even after the other entity had become a slave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. The router or switch no longer accepts gratuitous |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ARPs from other VRRP entities while it is still the Master. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00012683 | Switch | 2 | After the AR770S rebooted, the Port Link/Activity and Duplex/Collision LEDs | - | - | Y |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - |
|
|
| sometimes did not blink in response to activity and collisions, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. The router detects the problem and recovers from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| it, if possible. If it cannot recover from the problem, it generates a log message |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| of severity 6, module SWK, type REST, and subtype FAIL. The log message says |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| “An LED error has been detected, please |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| appears again, contact your technical support representative for help.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version