14 of 22

Revision Nov 2008

iGen3 Digital Production Press Non-Xerox Tested Media List - Europe - April 2010

The Non-Xerox Tested Media List contains non-Xerox branded paper and specialty media. Xerox has tested many media products on the Xerox iGen3 Digital Production Press and based on such testing have published this list of tested media products which may or may not, at the time of and based upon such testing, meet Xerox performance criteria. No subsequent testing has been done and

therefore no determination can be made as to whether or not such products would currently fail or pass Xerox performance criteria.

Green - Good test results, purchase a small quantity to insure expectations are met.

Yellow - Customer should validate the limitations are acceptable for their application.

Not Recommended

Xerox makes no guarantees or warranties, either expressed or implied, concerning the performance, use, consistency or replacement of non-Xerox branded media or throughput products. Customers should inquire directly of their paper distributor or manufacturer for any guarantees they may offer. When purchasing a particular media

product for the first time, customers are advised to purchase small quantities to insure that expectations are met. For guaranteed best performance, use digitally optimized paper and specialty media from Xerox Supplies.

Product Description

Weight g/m2

Coating type

Size

Application

Number of sheets run

Image Quality

Image

Permanence

Runnability

Auto

Duplex

Date of

test

Notes

Xerox Guaranteed Media Alternative

Envelopes

Envelope- Kraft

 

Envelope (Sac) peel and

 

 

 

Not Recommended

 

 

Wrinkle

 

130 gsm

229 x 324mm

Envelope printing

20

No

Feb-04

Excessive jams during run

 

 

 

Stick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Misfeeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Envelope

 

Envelope plain Peel and

 

 

 

Not Recommended

 

 

Wrinkle

 

90 gsm

229 x 324mm

Envelope printing

20

 

Feb-04

Excessive jams during run

 

Stick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Misfeeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Envelope- Kraft

 

Envelope plain(pouch)

 

 

 

Not Recommended

 

 

Wrinkle

 

130 gsm

229 x 324mm

Envelope printing

20

 

Feb-04

Excessive jams during run

 

Peel and Stick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Misfeeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Envelope

 

Envelope with window

 

 

 

Not Recommended

 

 

Wrinkle

 

90 gsm

229 x 324mm

Envelope printing

20

No

Feb-04

Excessive jams during run

 

Peel &Stick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Misfeeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translucent, Metallic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Curious Metalic

120 gsm

Coated 2 side Gloss

A3

Full colour

900

 

 

 

Yes

Dec-06

Service risk due to contamination in fuser system

 

Zanders T2 2000

200gsm

Tracing Paper

A4

Full colour

500

Not Recommended

 

 

No

Sep-05

low opacity of the substrate causes misfeeds.

 

Simulator Translucent,metalic

90 gsm

Tracing Paper

SRA3

Full colour

1000

Not Recommended

No

Jan-06

low opacity of the substrate causes misfeeds.

 

Canson T2000 tracing paper

200 gsm

Tracing Paper

SRA3

Greeting Card

2

Not Recommended

No

Apr-03

Excessive jams during run

 

Misfeeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carbonless Paper, NCR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Idem Digital carbonless - CF

60 gsm

Carbonless Paper CF

A4

forms

200

Not Recommended

Yes

Sep-07

Poor toner adhesion, Jams and Sheets creasing

 

Idem Digital carbonless - CB

60 gsm

Carbonless Paper CB

A4

forms

200

Not Recommended

Yes

Sep-07

Poor toner adhesion, Jams and Sheets creasing

 

Idem Digital carbonless - CFB

80 gsm

Carbonless Paper CFB

A4

forms

200

Not Recommended

Yes

Sep-07

Poor toner adhesion, Jams and Sheets creasing

 

Idem Digital carbonless - CF

80 gsm

Carbonless Paper CF

A4

forms

1000

Not Recommended

Yes

Jul-05

Poor toner adhesion, Jams and Sheets creasing

 

Idem Digital carbonless - CB

80 gsm

Carbonless Paper CB

A4

forms

1000

Not Recommended

Yes

Jul-05

Poor toner adhesion, Jams and Sheets creasing

 

Labels, Adhesives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

School Stickers - Gold label A3

136

Polyester

A3

Labels

300

Not Recommended

No

May-08

Due to poor toner adhesion, high post fuser curl, and stacking jams this product is not recommended.

Xerox Labels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gloss Clear Polyester permanent label

 

Polyester

A3

Labels

1000

 

 

 

No

Oct-04

Simplex only, Printed image should be within die cut edges. Image permanence can be improved

 

 

 

 

 

with EIP mode, POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gloss White Polyester permanent label

 

Polyester

A4

Labels

1001

 

 

 

No

Nov-04

Simplex only, Printed image should be within die cut edges. Image permanence can be improved

 

 

 

 

 

with EIP mode, POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raflabrite 1 to view adhesive labels

180 gsm

coated

A4

Packaging labels

200

 

 

 

No

Nov-05

Simplex only.High curl in sheets post printing will cause stacking and post processing jams or issues

Xerox Labels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raflabrite 40 to view adhesive labels

180 gsm

coated

A4

Packaging labels

600

 

 

 

No

Nov-05

Simplex only. Print deletions around the die cuts.High curl in sheets post printing will cause stacking

Xerox labels

 

 

 

and post processing jams or issues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gruppo Pasqui Bottle label

185 gsm

Uncoated

364 x 571

Bottle labels

100

Not Recommended

 

 

No

Feb-08

Not Recommended due to high number of jams

Xerox labels

Falck Member cards

100 gsm,

Uncoated

A4

Bike sticker and member card

3000

Not Recommended

Yes

Oct-08

Not Recommended due to high number of jams

Xerox labels

Silver Reflective clear backed label

250 gsm

Coated

345 x 495

Labels

20

Not Recommended

No

Jan-07

Poor transfer of toners, poor toner adhesion and runability jams. This was a small test.

Xerox labels

Silver Reflective paper backed label

250 gsm

Coated

345 x 495

Labels

20

Not Recommended

No

Jan-07

Poor transfer of toners, poor toner adhesion and runability jams. This was a small test.

Xerox labels

White paper backed label

260 gsm

Coated

345 x 495

Labels

20

Not Recommended

No

Jan-07

Poor transfer of toners, poor toner adhesion and runability jams. This was a small test.

Xerox labels

Textured

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fedrigoni Marina Conchiglia

175 gsm

Textured

SRA3

Creative

200

 

 

 

Yes

Aug-04

ATA need for Acceptable image transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Fedrigoni Tintoretto Gesso 200 gsm

200 gsm

Textured

SRA7

Creative

200

 

 

 

Yes

Aug-04

ATA need for Acceptable image transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Fedrigoni Constellation Ivory E/E Raster 240 gsm

240 gsm

Textured

SRA5

Creative

200

 

 

 

Yes

Aug-04

ATA need for Acceptable image transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Fedrigoni Constellation Snow E/E Raster

240 gsm

Textured

SRA3

Business cards

3000

 

 

 

Yes

Feb-03

ATA may be needed for acceptable transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Fedrigoni Ivory E/E Tela 240 gsm

240gsm

Textured

SRA6

Creative

200

 

 

 

Yes

Aug-04

ATA need for Acceptable image transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Terreus

250 gsm

Textured

SRA3

Greeting Cards

250

 

 

 

Yes

Aug-04

ATA may be needed for acceptable transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fedrigoni Constellation Snow E21 Silk

280 gsm

Textured - 1 side

SRA3

Business cards

3000

 

 

 

No

Feb-03

Jams in stacker in Auto Duplex mode

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

 

 

 

ATA may be needed for acceptable transfer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sneeuww Gesat

200 gsm

Textured

315 x 440

Full colour

200

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-07

small test only. Caution when using this media.

Xerox Textured Linen 250 gsm

Sneeuww Gesat

250 gsm

Textured

315 x 440

Full colour

200

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-07

small test only. Caution when using this media.

Xerox Textured Linen 250 gsm

Sneeuww Linnen

250 gsm

Textured

315 x 440

Full colour

200

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-07

small test only. Caution when using this media.

Xerox Textured Linen 250 gsm

ColourPlus Textured

250 gsm

textured - 1 side

SRA3

Greeting Cards

3000

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-06

Poor print quality and mottle

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

ColourPlus Textured

270 gsm

textured - 1 side

SRA3

Greeting Cards

3000

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-06

Poor print quality and mottle

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Consular Coated

300 gsm

Textured

364 x 521

Greeting Card

3000

 

 

 

Yes

Oct-03

ATA may be needed for acceptable transfer

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

 

 

 

Media used by customer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sneeuww Gesat

300 gsm

Textured

315 x 440

Full colour

200

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-07

small test only. Caution when using this media.

Xerox Textured Linen 250 gsm

Feltmark

300 gsm

Textured

SRA3

Greeting Card

3000

Not Recommended

 

 

Yes

Oct-06

Fuser contamination

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Mellotex Regency embossed

340 gsm

Texured_2 side coated

SRA3

Business cards

3000

 

 

 

No

Mar-03

Jams in stacker in Auto Duplex mode

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Galerie image embossed

235 gsm

Textured

SRA3

Full colour

3000

 

 

 

Yes

Sep-07

Poor Image transfer, High curl, jams in stacker

Xerox Textured 250 gsm

Page 36
Image 36
Xerox 90 Envelopes Envelope- Kraft, Translucent, Metallic Curious Metalic, Zanders T2, Simulator Translucent,metalic

90 specifications

The Xerox 90, launched in the late 1970s, was a groundbreaking product in the realm of photocopying and printing technology. This innovative machine was designed to address the growing demands of businesses and offices that required high-quality copies and efficient document reproduction processes. The Xerox 90 marked a significant improvement over its predecessors, establishing itself as a key player in the evolution of photocopying technology.

One of the main features of the Xerox 90 was its exceptional speed and efficiency. It could produce up to 90 copies per minute, enabling high-volume jobs to be completed in a fraction of the time compared to earlier models. This impressive output not only improved productivity but also allowed businesses to handle larger document workloads without sacrificing quality.

The technology behind the Xerox 90 relied on advanced electrostatic printing techniques. It utilized a dry toning system, which was more efficient and cleaner than traditional wet toners. The machine employed a photoconductive drum, where a light source would create an electrostatic image that attracted toner particles. This process not only ensured precise reproduction of text and images but also facilitated a range of paper sizes and weights, catering to diverse printing needs.

In addition to its speed and quality, the Xerox 90 was renowned for its reliability. Built with robust materials and components, it was designed to endure the rigors of heavy daily use. The machine’s user-friendly interface made it easy to operate, allowing staff to navigate through various settings and adjustments with ease.

Another characteristic that set the Xerox 90 apart was its adaptability and integration capabilities. It could connect with other office devices, enabling seamless document management and workflow integration. This feature became especially important as businesses sought to streamline their operations and improve efficiency.

Moreover, the Xerox 90 introduced the concept of electronic document management years ahead of its time. This forward-thinking approach laid the groundwork for modern digital document handling, influencing future generations of office equipment.

In summary, the Xerox 90 was a landmark innovation in photocopying technology, characterized by its high-speed output, advanced electrostatic printing, reliability, and adaptability. Its influence continues to be felt in the development of modern copiers and printers, epitomizing a pivotal moment in the history of office technology.