Body Sites for Temperature Assessment
An Overview of Temperature Measuring Sites
Oral Temperature
Oral temperature measurement is by far the most common clinical method in use today, and is responsible for masking the greatest number of fevers. Oral temperature can be mislead- ingly lowered by patient activity such as tachypnea, coughing, moaning, drinking, eating, mouthbreathing, snoring, talking, etc. Alarmingly, another cause of low oral temperatures is the fever itself. For each 0.6°C (1°F) temperature elevation, the pulse rate usually increases approximately 10 beats per minute, there is a 7% increase in oxygen consumption, increas- ing the respiratory rate approximately 2 cycles per
minute. The resulting increase in respiration can further lower oral temperature sufficiently to mask a fever.
Figure 1 is of interest as it illustrates fever masking even when clinicians had eliminated all obvious mouth- breathers from the study. This emergency room study presents the temperature difference (rectal minus oral) in 310 patients with a wide range of respiratory rates. The straight line of best fit is shown. The stippled area demonstrates the traditional normal difference between rectal and oral temperature (0.3°- 0.65°C). The investi- gators concluded that many patients with tachypnea would have oral temperatures in the normal range despite the presence of clinical fever, seriously mislead- ing the clinician.
Rectal Temperature
Generally, rectal temperature is considered an indicator of
deep tissue and critical tissue temperatures, but long standing data demonstrate that rectal temperature can be a lagging and unsatisfactory index. Fifty years ago, Eichna et al reported differences between intracardiac, intravascular and rectal temperatures on afebrile patients to be so insignificant that for all practical purposes, the temperatures may be considered to be the same. Certainly rectal temperature is far less invasive than a pulmonary artery catheter, how- ever, in the same study, data on febrile patients support sizeable differences.
Other comparisons between rectal, esophageal and aortic temperatures undertaken on hypothermic patients by different researchers also confirm similar differences. Subsequent but equally comprehensive comparisons on healthy volunteers further confirmed not only temperature differences, but also quantified significant lags in rectal temperature vs. hypo- thalamic temperature by times of order one hour. This is of interest since the blood as it enters and affects the critical tissue in the hypothalamus should have considerable signifi- cance in thermal homeostasis. However, this early data on hypothalamic temperature was measured by a thermocouple inserted against (and often times perforating) the tympanic membrane. With significant improvements in the methodology, more recent clinical observa- tions show that the time constant of rectal temperature in critically ill patients may be consid- erably longer, and in some cases, as much as a day.
Body Sites for Temperature Assessment
17