ANTENNA CONSIDERATIONS
The choice of antennas is a critical and often overlooked design
consideration. The range, performance, and legality of an RF link are critically dependent upon the antenna. While adequate antenna performance can often be obtained by trial and error methods, antenna design and matching is a complex task. A professionally designed antenna, such as those from Linx, will
help ensure maximum performance and FCC compliance.
Linx transmitter modules typically have an output power that is slightly higher than the legal limits. This allows the designer to use an inefficient antenna, such as a loop trace or helical, to meet size, cost, or cosmetic requirements and still achieve full legal output power for maximum range. If an efficient antenna is used, then some attenuation of the output power will likely be needed. This can easily be accomplished by using the LADJ line or a
A receiver antenna should be optimized for the frequency or band in which the receiver operates and to minimize the reception of
It is usually best to utilize a basic
ANTENNA SHARING
In cases where a transmitter and receiver |
|
| |
module are combined to form a transceiver, |
| VDD | |
it is often advantageous to share a single | Transmitter | 0.1μF | |
Module | 0.1μF | ||
antenna. To accomplish this, an antenna |
| Antenna | |
| 0.1μF | ||
switch must be used to provide isolation |
| GND | |
| 0.1μF | ||
between the modules so that the full |
| ||
Receiver | GND | ||
transmitter output power is not put on the |
| ||
Module |
| ||
sensitive front end of the receiver. There |
| 0.1μF | |
are a wide variety of antenna switches that |
| Select | |
|
| ||
Figure 18: Typical Antenna Switch | |||
are |
the most popular are switches from Macom and NEC. Look for an antenna
GENERAL ANTENNA RULES
The following general rules should help in maximizing antenna performance.
1.Proximity to objects such as a user’s hand, body, or metal objects will cause an antenna to detune. For this reason, the antenna shaft and tip should be positioned as far away from such objects as possible.
2.Optimum performance will be obtained
from a 1/4- or |
|
mounted at a right angle to the ground |
|
plane. In many cases, this isn’t desirable |
|
for practical or ergonomic reasons, thus, | OPTIMUM |
NOT RECOMMENDED | |
an alternative antenna style such as a | USEABLE |
|
helical, loop, or patch may be utilized Figure 19: Ground Plane Orientation and the corresponding sacrifice in performance accepted.
3.If an internal antenna is to be used, keep it away from other metal components, particularly large items like transformers, batteries, PCB tracks, and ground planes. In many cases, the space around the antenna is as important as the antenna itself. Objects in close proximity to the antenna can cause direct detuning, while those farther away will alter the antenna’s symmetry.
4. In many antenna designs, particularly |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
VERTICAL λ/4 GROUNDED | |||||||
whips, the ground plane acts as a counterpoise, | |||||||
ANTENNA (MARCONI) | |||||||
forming, in essence, a |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
E | DIPOLE | ||||||
| |||||||
| ELEMENT | ||||||
reason, adequate ground plane area is essential. |
|
| λ/4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
The ground plane can be a metal case or | I |
|
|
|
|
| |
areas on a circuit board. Ideally, it should have a |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
surface area > the overall length of the | GROUND |
|
|
|
|
| |
PLANE |
|
|
|
|
| ||
radiating element. This is often not practical due to | VIRTUAL λ/4 |
| λ/4 | ||||
DIPOLE |
|
|
|
|
| ||
size and configuration constraints. In these |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instances, a designer must make the best use of the |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Figure 20: Dipole Antenna | |||||||
area available to create as much ground plane as | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
possible in proximity to the base of the antenna. In cases where the antenna is remotely located or the antenna is not in close proximity to a circuit board, ground plane, or grounded metal case, a metal plate may be used to maximize the antenna’s performance.
5.Remove the antenna as far as possible from potential interference sources. Any frequency of sufficient amplitude to enter the receiver’s front end will reduce system range and can even prevent reception entirely. Switching power supplies, oscillators, or even relays can also be significant sources of potential interference. The single best weapon against such problems is attention to placement and layout. Filter the module’s power supply with a
switch that has high isolation and low loss at the desired frequency of operation. Generally, the Tx or Rx status of a switch will be controlled by a product’s microprocessor, but the user may also make the selection manually. In some cases, where the characteristics of the Tx and Rx antennas need to be different or antenna switch losses are unacceptable, it may be more appropriate to utilize two discrete antennas.
6.In some applications, it is advantageous to place the module and antenna away from the main equipment. This can avoid interference problems and allows the antenna to be
oriented for optimum performance. Always use 50Ω coax, like
| CASE | |
NUT | GROUND PLANE | |
(MAY BE NEEDED) | ||
|
Figure 21: Remote Ground Plane
Page 14 | Page 15 |