![](/images/new-backgrounds/1018825/188257x1.webp)
4 | Beryllium tweeter | ™ | |
| |||
|
| User manual Utopia Be line |
The reversed dome tweeter is a hallmak of
The main advantage of the inverted dome tweeter or the “full” range tweeter...
The experience acquired over the last twenty years has allowed
The research began by testing fibre domes, as a simple and less sensitive way to validate the advantages of the reversed dome with regards to energy response. Then the company introduced more rigid metal domes to extend the response in high frequencies, and with Titanium producing the most impressive results it has proved to be the most relevant choice. Today to exceed these limits and particularly to extend the response to nearly 40kHz, we need to move towards a material even lighter and more rigid. Already competitors have moved to introduce super tweeters to satisfy the extreme requirements of the new
First of all, the distance between the tweeters, for frequencies where the wavelength is of the order of cm, poses serious problems of coherence. A filtering is imposed which destroys, by the losses and distortion of phase, the benefits introduced by extending the frequency response. So it is advisable to point out that simply extending the high frequency response is not an end in itself, as the ear is most sensitive to transients. The improvement with regards to the impulse response is only perceptible at a tweeter output far beyond the 20kHz, limit and to far beyond the perception of human hearing. We should not forget that
Beryllium - The ideal material for a dome.
An ideal dome must combine lightness, rigidity and damping. Currently, only one material offers the possibility of a significant improvement. Beryllium’s density is 2.5 times lower than Titanium and 1.5 times lower than Aluminium while its’ rigidity is 3 times higher than Titanium and 5 times superior to Aluminium. Which means that for a dome of identical mass, a Beryllium version is 7 times more rigid than one made of Titanium or Aluminum - which have similar
rigidity for a given mass. Moreover, the velocity of sound in a Beryllium dome is 3 times faster than a Titanium version and 2.5 times faster than Aluminum. However, the manufacturing of Beryllium remains very difficult and its production has been limited to just three countries: the United States, France and Russia. To date, Great Britain, Germany and Japan do not manufacture pure Beryllium, rather using it in the form of an alloy. Beryllium is an excellent
-the only metal able to scratch glass - it is only used in strategic applications in the aeronautical and military industries and consequently, its unique characteristics make it extraordinarily expensive, much more than gold and nearly 100 times that of Titanium.
The only solution for
The analysis of the mechanical characteristics inevitably leads to Beryllium’s choice as the ideal material for a tweeter dome. However, a major problem exists because no company has been able to manufacture such a dome. To arrive at a solution, required
And the result is in line with the company’s hopes and expectations of an outstandingly detailed loudspeaker which extends to nearly 40 kHz while maintaining a perfect impulse response.
A standard dome tweeter has a poor mechanical coupling with the voice coil attached to the outer diameter of the dome.
The result of the mechanical forces shows that considerable energy is lost into the suspension where it is dissipated as heat.
as sound.
The Beryllium tweeter offers a very extended response up to five octave from 1,000Hz to 40,000Hz. The impulse response is ideal.
*In the past certain manufacturers have attempted to use Beryllium for the construction of a direct radiating tweeter dome. However, they have actually only used Beryllium as a surface coating on a dome structure leading to different characteristics to anything achieved with pure Beryllium. .
Comparaison beetween Beryllium, Titanium and Aluminum. Beryllium is lighter and nearly five time more rigid.