Samsung manual Meps − Televisions

Page 8

MEPS − Televisions

April 2005

The effect of the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Agreement means that goods that are acceptable for sale in one jurisdiction can legally be sold anywhere in Australia and New Zealand. If Australia has a mandatory MEPS regime − which now seems unlikely − and New Zealand does not, theoretically it would be possible to import non-compliant TVs to Australia although the dangers are more apparent than real.

The introduction of a MEPS scheme would see annual energy savings increase from 8 GWh in 2006 to 29 GWh in 2025, with a cumulative saving in this period of 392 GWh. In addition avoided power costs would save additional carbon charges with a net present value of the cumulative savings till 2025 of $10.78 million.

The cost of applying MEPS would be largely absorbed by retailers and consumers, but could attract annual administration costs of $100,000 with an NPV of $2.2 million. Compared with the NPV of the electricity saved of $8.3 million, there is a substantial benefit cost ratio of almost four. If the savings in carbon charges are included the benefits are almost doubled.

Although Australia originally aimed to introduce a combined MEPS/labelling scheme by 2006, recent stakeholder feedback in Australia has opposed mandatory labelling, and it is now unlikely to proceed, although voluntary labelling and MEPS will still go ahead. It would still be advisable to keep our alignment with Australia, and it is recommended that New Zealand introduce a similar scheme to whatever is finally agreed to in Australia.

Further consultation with the importers and major retailers will be necessary to ensure that there is no undue resistance to the scheme, to maximise compliance and adherence to the principles of the scheme. It should be possible to introduce such a MEPS and labelling scheme by the end of 2006 if decisions and consultation begin as soon as possible.

Page 5

A study produced for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority by

Wise Analysis Ltd

Page 7 Page 9
Image 8
Page 7 Page 9
Contents Meps − Televisions Preface Televisions Contents Recommended Policy Options for New Zealand List of FiguresGlossary Executive Summary Meps − Televisions Introduction General comparison between New Zealand and Australia Area PopulationPer capita GDP Principal exportsAnalogue Standard-Definition TV SdtvHigh Definition TV Hdtv Television Receiver TypesStandard Cathode Ray Tube CRT Slimline televisionsLiquid Crystal Display LCD Ii Plasma Screens and TVsIii Rear Projection Iv Set top boxesTV Formats All Television TypesTVs Data 2000 % Source Statistics New Zealand, Household Economic SurveyWide-screen Televisions New Zealand annual TV market based on type Units178,603 242,474 290,499 Summary − TV demographics Household Energy ConsumptionTVs 440Wh/day 494,500 785,600 322Trends in TV Power Consumption Standard CRT TelevisionsLCD Televisions Best practice for LCD TVs In-use consumption Watts StandbyAverage Set Top Box Power Levels Type Standby W Technology Scope for Energy EfficiencySet top boxes In-use W 12 23 17 15Voluntary Programs Mandatory Programs Summary − International Standards and Programs Energy Cost Savings TVs Greenhouse Gas Reduction Potential − Savings in CO2 Emissions − BAU and MepsPolicy and Program Approaches to Improve Energy Efficiency Minimum Energy Performance Standards Meps Costs of Meps General Policy Recommendations Summary − Recommended Policy Options for New Zealand ConsultationImplementation Program Gerry Coates Managing DirectorIndustry Bodies Importers/ManufacturersGovernment Agencies
Top Page Image Contents