IBM BC-203 manual Comparing QLLC Conversion to SDLLC, BC-224

Models: BC-203

1 52
Download 52 pages 30.47 Kb
Page 22
Image 22
Comparing QLLC Conversion to SDLLC

Overview of IBM Networking

IBM Network Media Translation

As Figure 97 shows, a router need not directly connect the two IBM end nodes; instead, some type of backbone WAN can connect them. Here, RSRB transports packets between Router A and Router B, while Router B performs all conversion between the LLC2 and X.25 protocols. Only the router attached to the serial line (Router B) needs to be configured for QLLC conversion. Both Router A and Router B are configured for normal RSRB.

Figure 97 QLLC Conversion Between a Single 37x5 and Multiple 3x74s across an Arbitrary WAN

Without local

acknowledgment BC-224 LLC2 session Manual backgroundManual background QLLC/X.25 session Manual background

With local Manual background LLC2 session Manual backgroundManual background TCP session Manual backgroundManual background QLLC/X.25 session Manual background acknowledgment

VR1

 

 

 

 

VR2

 

Token

T0

Arbitrary

X.25

37x5

 

 

 

Ring

 

WAN

S0

 

 

 

 

Router A

 

Router B

3270

3x74

3x74

S1395a

= Virtual Ring

3270

How communication sessions are established over the communication link varies depending on whether or not LLC2 local acknowledgment has been configured on Router A’s Token Ring interface. In both cases, the SNA session extends end-to-end and the QLLC/X.25 session extends from Router B to the 3x74 cluster controller. If LLC2 local acknowledgment has not been configured, the LLC2 session extends from the 37x5 FEP across the Token Ring network and the arbitrary WAN to Router B. In contrast, when LLC2 local acknowledgment has been configured, the LLC2 session extends from the 37x5 FEP Router A, where it is locally terminated. A TCP session is then used across the arbitrary WAN to Router B.

Comparing QLLC Conversion to SDLLC

Although the procedures you use to configure QLLC are similar to those used to configure SDLLC, there are structural and philosophical differences between the point-to-point links that SDLC uses and the multiplexed virtual circuits that X.25 uses.

The most significant structural difference between QLLC conversion and SDLLC is the addressing. To allow a device to use LLC2 to transfer data, both SDLLC and QLLC provide virtual MAC addresses. In SDLLC, the actual MAC address is built by combining the defined virtual MAC (whose last byte is 0x00) with the secondary address used on the SDLC link; in this way, SDLLC supports multidrop. In QLLC conversion, multidrop is meaningless, so the virtual MAC address represents just one session and is defined as part of the X.25 configuration. Because one physical X.25 interface can support many simultaneous connections for many different remote devices, you only need one physical link to the X.25 network. The different connections on different virtual circuits all use the same physical link.

The most significant difference between QLLC conversion and SDLLC is the fact that a typical SDLC/SDLLC operation uses a leased line. In SDLC, dial-up connections are possible, but the maximum data rate is limited. In QLLC, both switched virtual circuits (SVCs) and permanent virtual

Cisco IOS Bridging and IBM Networking Configuration Guide

BC-224

Page 22
Image 22
IBM BC-203 manual Comparing QLLC Conversion to SDLLC, BC-224