
Application Report
SPRAA56 – September 2004
DSP/BIOS 
Brian Jeff  | DSP Field Software Applications  | 
Arnie Reynoso  | Software Development Systems  | 
ABSTRACT
DSP/BIOS and the Reference Frameworks allow developers to 
  | 
  | Contents  | 
  | 
1 Important Benchmarks for Video Applications  | 2  | ||
2  | Base Application Overview  | 3  | |
  | 2.1  | DSP/BIOS and RF5 Components Used  | 5  | 
  | 2.2  | Requirements for Viewing RTA Benchmarks  | 7  | 
3 Modifications to the Base Example | 7  | ||
  | 3.1  | Splitting the Encode and Decode CELLs  | 8  | 
  | 3.2  | Adding the Control TSK and MBX Communication  | 8  | 
  | 3.3  | Querying the H.263 Encoder for Status  | 9  | 
  | 3.4  | Controlling the Frame Rate  | 10  | 
4 RTA Techniques for Performance Measurement | 11  | ||
  | 4.1  | Measuring Function Execution Time with the UTL Module  | 11  | 
  | 4.2  | Measuring Task Scheduling Latencies  | 12  | 
  | 4.3  | Measuring   | 12  | 
  | 4.4  | Measuring the Frame Rate  | 13  | 
  | 4.5  | Simulating High CPU Load Stress Conditions with Dummy NOP Loads  | 14  | 
  | 4.6  | Programmatic Measurement of Total CPU Load  | 14  | 
  | 4.7  | Memory Bus Utilization  | 15  | 
  | 4.8  | Bitrate and Frame Type  | 17  | 
  | 4.9  | Methods for Transmitting Measured Performance Data  | 18  | 
  | 4.10   | 19  | |
5 Viewing Benchmarks in the Instrumented Application | 19  | ||
  | 5.1  | Requirements  | 19  | 
  | 5.2  | Running the Application  | 20  | 
  | 5.3  | Interpreting the Benchmarks  | 22  | 
  | 5.4  | Controlling the   | 25  | 
6  | References | 26  | |
Appendix A. Performance Impact | 27  | ||
  | A.1  | Overhead of Performance Measurement Techniques  | 27  | 
  | A.2  | RTA Effects on CPU Load  | 27  | 
  | A.3  | Memory Footprint  | 28  | 
1