Slowdown
Slowdown
Slowdown
Slowdown
1000%
900%
800%
700%
600%
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
0%
1000%
900%
800%
700%
600%
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
0%
1000%
900%
800%
700%
600%
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
0%
1000%
900%
800%
700%
600%
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
0%
No Lookaside
| 1000% |
| 900% |
| 800% |
| 700% |
Slowdown | 600% |
500% | |
| 400% |
| 300% |
200%
100%
0%
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
(a) 100 Mb/s
| 1000% | |
| 900% | |
| 800% | |
| 700% | |
Slowdown | 600% | |
500% | ||
| ||
| 400% | |
| 300% |
200%
100%
0%
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
(b) 10 Mb/s
| 1000% | |
| 900% | |
| 800% | |
| 700% | |
Slowdown | 600% | |
500% | ||
| ||
| 400% | |
| 300% |
200%
100%
0%
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
(c) 1 Mb/s
| 1000% | |
| 900% | |
| 800% | |
| 700% | |
Slowdown | 600% | |
500% | ||
| ||
| 400% | |
| 300% |
200%
100%
0%
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
(d) 100 Kb/s
With Lookaside
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
Operations Sorted by Slowdown
These figures compares the distribution of slowdown for the operations of the CDA benchmark without lookaside caching to their
slowdowns with lookaside caching to a DVD. | 12 |
|
