Theory
and 6
Design
Lateral Sound
Concert Hall Acoustics
For decades the study of
While it was found that most good halls have comparable RT60 curves, different halls with similar RT60 measurements can sound very different from each other and listener reactions to them can vary widely. Clearly, other important factors in the sound field were not being measured. Through the work of many people (including Manfred Schroeder, A. H. Marshall, Michael Barron and others) some of these factors were identified.
In an effort to answer the question of why some halls sound so much better than others, Schroeder devised a method for comparing them without transporting his subjects from hall to hall. Using a dummy head with microphone diaphragms in place of ear drums, Schroeder made binaural recordings in many halls. These recordings, played back through ear- phones, gave excellent reproduction of spatial qualities. Unfortunately, the stereo image tended to appear entirely inside the head, spoiling the accu- racy of such recordings as a test of concert halls.
To overcome this problem, Schroeder played his recordings through a pair of loudspeakers in an anechoic chamber, using a special
This technique allowed the first direct comparisons of specific halls.1 From these studies it was found that the best halls were all characterized by having large differences in the sound between the two ears in the dummy head. Very simply, the best halls gave the most stereo.
Michael Barron defined this characteristic in halls as Spatial Impression (SI) and found that it was created by
Halls with similar RT60 sound very different. The best have large amounts of sideways moving re- flected sound.
Page 35