|
|
|
|
|
|
| Features in |
|
|
| 31 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR | Module | Level | Description | AR400 | AR7x5 | AR750S |
| Rapier i |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00010996 | Port | 2 | When port authentication was using a RADIUS server, it sometimes stopped | Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y | - |
| Authentication |
| working after several hours. This was because port authentication generated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RADIUS Accounting Request (STOP) messages with an incorrect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Time value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00011040 | Ping | 2 | When the router or switch was configured with multiple logical interfaces, it | Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
|
| chose the source address of the ICMP Echo Reply incorrectly in some |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| configurations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00011068 | SSL | 2 | Previously, there was a memory corruption issue in the SSL client and server | Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
|
| implementation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00011111 | IPX | 2 | Forwarding an 802.3 or ETHII encapsulated IPX packet over a VLAN to a remote | - | - | - |
| Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
|
| network occasionally caused the switch to reboot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR00011213 | PIM 6 | 2 | Previously, the switch treated a valid bootstrap message as a bad message if it | Y | Y | Y |
| Y | Y | - |
| - | Y | Y | Y |
|
|
| received the message on two or more interfaces, and when PIM6 operated in a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| looped or network topology that had multiple unicast routes to the same |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| destination(s), it sometimes selected a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| selection for RP and BSR elections. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This issue has been addressed by an additional algorithm to deal with equal cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| multipath routes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. if more than one route to the same given destination with equal cost exists, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| then the route with highest nexthop IP address value will be selected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| b. if the nexthop IP address values are the same (the routes come from the same |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| device on different interfaces), then the routes with highest interface index will |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| be selected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version