whose existence he can no longer quite believe;

the cynical squire has learned to take life as it

comes, without the prop of divinity. Together they

are Everyman (and Bergman), and together they

face the questions that vexed and haunted the

Fourteenth Century and our own: In a world beset by evil, in

a world that God has seemingly deserted, in the face of cer-

tain annihilation, how does one live one’s life with value, and,

without the goodness of God, whence does that value come?

The film’s opening montage thrusts us immediately – and

nearly wordlessly – into the heart of the matter. A gorgeous

shot of a sea eagle, floating aloof, predatory, and majestic in a

storm sky; a picturesque cusp of mountainous beach; a brief

voice-over quotation from the Book of Revelations about the

silence in heaven following the Lamb’s opening of the Seventh

Seal; and then the shingle where the knight and his squire lie

sleeping among the rocks, looking as if they’ve been tossed

up, half-dead, from the sea. Their horses lap at the surf. A

chess set sits on the stones by the knight’s kit. The knight tries

to pray, perhaps for his safe deliverance and return, but can-

not complete his prayer. Getting to his

feet, he awakens his squire who grouses at

him mockingly, and out of nowhere there

is chalk-faced Death (Bengt Ekerot) in his

black cassock come to claim what is final-

ly and always his.

As in the Church emblems that

Bergman daydreamed over when he was a

boy, where Death and a Knight (represent-

ing Mankind) confront each other over a

chessboard, the knight seeks to delay his

doom by challenging Death to a game of

chess. Although the knight doesn’t fear

Death, he fears a death without meaning,

without the judgment of a God he can’t

quite believe in or forsake. He plays for

time – to do one last meaningful thing, and

continue his search for grace. The film is

ostensibly about this quest to do good –

about the very possibility of good in an evil

world where all but death is uncertain.

In other films that attempt allegorical effects, the symbol-

ic values of characters and events are meanings derived from

the action as it unfolds – not essences from which we start.

Bergman simply presents us with Types – Death, Spirit, Rea-

son – as if we were watching a latter-day Mystery play, and

only later goes on to give them human dimensions. Even

those who appreciate the film’s ambitiousness may find the

opening allegory rather too portentous, and wonder whether

such blatant symbolism can sustain an entire movie.

Not content to present us with an allegory of the eternal

contest between Death and Man, Bergman quickly tries some-

thing that is in some ways even more delicate and dangerous

and potentially just as prone to travesty. He gives us Inno-

cence in the form of a family of itinerant players, also jour-

neying through Sweden: a father called Jof or Joseph (Nils

Poppe), a mother called Mia or Mary (Bibi Andersson), and

their infant child. This grouping is clearly meant to suggest

the Holy Family (or the “holiness of the human spirit,” as

Bergman has it). But the literalness of the allegory begins to

break down here, and something more personal to make its

way in.

To begin with, Jof is scarcely a holy personage. He is an

acrobat, a singer, a performer – albeit a bad one – a charming

and persistent liar, a writer of sweet quasi-religious love

songs, a bit of a thief, a childlike braggart, and a self-professed

seer blessed with second sight (although no one else truly

believes in his visions). In short, he is in show business. His

innocence, though sweet and real enough, is not the Inno-

cence of the Lamb of God, but the innocence of the artist,

whose childlike imagination isolates him from the hurly-burly

of the world of the knight and the squire – but, just as impor-

tantly and vitally, reflects the world of the knight and the

squire back to them, turning its terrors and wonders into play.

While the mask of Death that Skat, the “director” of the small

troupe of actors, wears and then hangs from a tree limb is a

symbolic reminder that death is everywhere present in the

brutal world of this film, it is also a reminder that not even

this fearsome mystery is beyond the ken of imagination.

Indeed, the entire film is an illustration of this.

Jof and Mia reflect something else that troubled Bergman

throughout his life and in this period particularly: his intellec-

tual’s isolation from other people. Of

all the characters in The Seventh Seal,

Jof and Mia are the only two who

express love for one another, the only

two who make a family. Everyone

else is alone; after ten years’ separa-

tion, even the knight and his wife,

when they finally meet again, are

strangers to each other. Although

there is something infantile about

Jof’s love for Mia – closer to the love

of a child for his mother than an erot-

ic attachment – it is an attachment (or

an acceptance) that Bergman explic-

itly says he hungered for.

Allegory has an inner movement

of its own, dictated by the dialectic of

its ideas. It can work itself out like a

straightforward argument, as in Pil -

grim’s Progress, or it can cloak its

meanings in mystery, like The Pearl.

The Seventh Seal is somewhere between. Bergman has clear-

ly invested his symbolic characters with fundamental aspects

of his own personality. But he has set them on a broad public

highway that leads past tableaux of the downfall of civiliza-

tion and culture, through a wasteland of medieval horrors that

have very modern parallels. The ghastly fascistic parade of

flagellants, which interrupts the players’ whimsical play about

death and suffering with the terrible reality of death and suf-

fering, the senseless burning of the girl witch, who after tor-

ture can only, and rightly, see the devil right beside us, are in

the film because they must be in the film – the allegory of

good and evil demands it. Bergman does all he can to make

these scenes memorable, including the superb lighting and

photography and the marvelous set design. But there remains

a formality in them that sets them off as separate episodes,

like frames in a diorama, without the naturalistic probability

of realistic narrative. This is not a complaint, but an observa-

tion. Allegory is the route Bergman chose, and episode is how

allegory works itself out.

Robin Wood notwithstanding, there are many scenes in

The Seventh Seal where the strength of Bergman’s personal

Page 101
Image 101
Sony G90 manual Face the questions that vexed and haunted, Only later goes on to give them human dimensions. Even