direct radiator) to bloated. The Salon’s soundstage com-

bines the best attributes of both types. It has better image

specificity than most dipoles, though it doesn’t render pin-

point images. There is a natural sense of size and weight to

images generated by the Salon. The soundstage itself seems

huge and encompassing on material such as that recorded

by Keith Johnson for Reference Recordings.

While the Salon doesn’t produce that phony see-into-it

transparency, you can easily distinguish between instruments

in space – if you want to. But the separation isn’t tossed in your

face. Indeed, this is true of all aspects of this speaker. It’s all

there and you can listen to it, if you want to. But you’ll proba-

bly be too busy listening to the music.

What more could I want from

the Salon? For now, it doesn’t

resolve the pulsation you

hear from live instruments. I

say for now because I haven’t

yet had an opportunity to

apply basic acoustic treat-

ments to the first-reflection

points in the room. The sensa-

tion I am discussing is subtle

and could easily be lost within

the ambient wash of an overly

live room. Because of room

issues not yet addressed, I sus-

pect that I have only heard a frac-

tion of this speaker’s potential. Never-

theless, it is already obvious that the Revel

Salon is the finest speaker I have ever used and

one of the best available at any price.

Revel Ultima Sub-15/LE-1

Subwoofer System – Bring-

ing in Reinforcements

If the Salon is so wonderful all alone, why

add the Sub-15 subwoofer (much less four of

them)? How ’bout: size matters. I used to

despise subwoofers, but home theater has infused

the old beasts with new vitality. More research has

been devoted to subwoofer design in the last few years than

in the preceding decades. As a High End kind of guy, I would-

n’t much care about all this subwoofer research if digital sig-

nal processing in controllers hadn’t made subwoofer

crossovers so much less audible and so much more flexible.

So, why add subwoofers to a state-of-the-art full-range

speaker? Removing the bottom octave from the Salon’s

duties frees up a good deal of power from the main amplifi-

er. Deep bass sucks up more power than anything else does.

By shifting the bass load to the LE-1 power amplifier, the

main power amplifier can perform at a higher level. Likewise

for the Salon woofers. It all adds up to more dynamic range

without compression that distorts the sound. Finally, it is

possible to place subwoofers in other locations that will

smooth out the bass response of the whole system. With four

subwoofers, it should be possible to do an even better job of

balancing the bass. Using multiple subs also results in lower

distortion because each sub doesn’t have to output as much

sound as one alone would.

My description of the Salon might lead you to think that

the bass in my room was seamless and free of resonance. I

wish. Using a wide variety of recordings, I can

draw a map of the disaster area called the bot-

tom three octaves. Don’t forget – this is war. I

mentioned the pronounced bump around 50

Hz. Listening to the bass guitar tracks on

Elvis Costello and Burt Bacharach’s Painted From Memory

[Mercury 314538002-2] was like riding a roller coaster. All

bumps and dips and the bumps were ugly. Similarly, trying to

follow the bass synthesizer lines in Celine Dion’s “My Heart

Will Go On” from the Titanic soundtrack [Sony SK 63213], a

worthwhile test disc for bass performance, was an exercise

in frustration. Some notes overpowered the arrangement

while others were nearly inaudible. But I know you know

what I’m talking about because this condition exists in every

room. I don’t care how much you move your speak-

ers around; the modes will get you every time. Over

time, you will probably accept all but the most pro-

nounced perturbations in tonal uniformity.

I worked well nigh a month trying to find the best

location for those four subs. I started by using the

Room Optimizer and quickly discovered that its value

dropped with the frequency. The charts reflected the

problems I kept bouncing into, but the program didn’t

offer me any real solutions (possibly a user limitation –

I need more time to work with the program). The main

problem was that I could get deep bass and midbass

bloat, or a good midbass blend and no low bass. Ulti-

mately, the four subwoofers ended up flanking

the Salons – one to each side of

both. This provided

the smoothest

blend with the

best extension,

but the response

below 30 Hz was

weak. Alert: This

was solely a room

problem.

It is worth working

this hard to get the bass right,

because if the lower octaves are

excessive, the midrange is clouded

by the bass resonances and perception of

the highest treble is warped. It can actually sound as if the tre-

ble is reduced in level, though that is not the case. Changing the

perceived tonal balance of a system this severely has a direct

correlation with the accuracy of timbre. Timbre for each instru-

ment is created by a finely balanced group of unique frequencies

and is easily disturbed by the gross irregularities arising from

poor bass reproduction, whether it is the fault of the speaker or

the room.

Bass has a profound effect on our perception of the tem-

poral aspects of music. I will acknowledge that a hi-fi cannot

change the beat of the music. But I just as steadfastly main-

tain that a system can alter our perception of the music’s

rhythms. Precision down through the bottom octave is essen-

tial to accurately define the beginning of a note. Smear that

moment and our perception of the moment and when it

occurs can change. Worse, if bass resonances get in the way

of the proper bloom and decay of a note, the transition from

one note to the next is smudged. Again, the points of refer-

ence in the music’s time are less clearly defined. Finally, musi-

Page 36
Image 36
Sony G90 manual Direct radiator to bloated. The Salon’s soundstage com, By Keith Johnson for Reference Recordings