If you look at Tintin, you can see that Tintin is already using that NSAP address and has registered it on Casimir:
Tintin# show lane client |
|
|
| ||
LE Client ATM1/0.1 | ELAN name: ilmi−test Admin: up | State: operational | |||
Client ID: 2 |
| LEC up for 39 seconds |
| ||
Join Attempt: 4 |
|
|
|
| |
HW Address: 0000.0000.0001 | Type: ethernet | Max Frame Size: 1516 | |||
ATM Address: 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.000000000001.01 | |||||
VCD | rxFrames txFrames | Type | ATM Address |
| |
0 | 0 | 0 | configure | 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4505.00 | |
14 | 1 | 2 | direct | 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4503.01 | |
15 | 1 | 0 | distribute | 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4503.01 | |
16 | 0 | 1 | send | 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4504.01 | |
17 | 2 | 0 | forward | 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4504.01 | |
If you look at Casimir, you can see that this address has already been registered:
Casimir# show atm route 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.000000000001.01
Codes: I − internal prefix, E − exterior prefix
I 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0000.0000.0001/152
Node 1: Port ATM0/0/3, by routing−control, 00:01:06, uni scope 15 adv_trig 0x2, src_mask 0x2, node−index 0, rtaddr_index 1
Casimir# show atm route
Codes: P − installing Protocol (S − Static, P − PNNI, R − Routing control), T − Type (I − Internal prefix, E − Exterior prefix, SE −
Summary Exterior prefix, SI − Summary Internal prefix,
ZE − Suppress Summary Exterior, ZI − Suppress Summary Internal)
P | T | Node/Port | St Lev | Prefix | |
~ ~~ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ~~ ~~~ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
P | I | 9 | 0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0010.1f2d.6801/104 |
P SI | 1 | 0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501/104 | |
R | I | 1 | ATM0/0/3 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0000.0000.0001/152 |
R | I | 1 | ATM2/0/0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4501/152 |
R | I | 1 | ATM2/0/0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4502/152 |
R | I | 1 | ATM2/0/0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4503/152 |
R | I | 1 | ATM2/0/0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4504/152 |
R | I | 1 | ATM2/0/0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4505/152 |
S | E | 1 | ATM0/0/3 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.00d0.069a.7c40/152 |
R | I | 1 | ATM2/0/0 | UP 0 | 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.4000.0c/128 |
This means that Bernard is not able to register its address via ILMI, since it is a duplicate. When the debug atm ilmi atm x/y/z command is issued on Bernard and Casimir, these debugs can be seen:
Bernard:
!−−− Output suppressed.
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Registration local validation attempt for 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0000.0000.0001.01
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Sent Out. Will be added on confirmation
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0):Sending out Request 930
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0):Response received for request 929
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Errored response <General Error> Function Type = ilmiReqOther
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Errored or no response received
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): ES database update not done
Cisco − ILMI Address Registration Problems: %LANE−3−NOREGILMI