33-3
Cisco IE 3010 Switch Software Configuration Guide
OL-23145-01
Chapter 33 Configuring QoS
Understanding QoS
All switches and routers that access the Internet rely on the class information to provide the same
forwarding treatment to packets with the same class information and different treatment to packets with
different class information. The class information in the packet can be assigned by end hosts or by
switches or routers along the way, based on a configured policy, detailed examination of the packet, or
both. Detailed examination of the packet is expected to happen closer to the edge of the network so that
the core switches and routers are not overloaded with this task.
Switches and routers along the path can use the class information to limit the amount of resources
allocated per traffic class. The behavior of an individual device when handling traffic in the DiffServ
architecture is called per-hop behavior. If all devices along a path provide a cons istent per-hop behavior,
you can construct an end-to-end QoS solution.
Implementing QoS in your network can be a simple or complex task and depends on the QoS features
offered by your internetworking devices, the traffic types and patterns in your network, a nd the
granularity of control that you need over incoming and outgoing traffic.
Basic QoS Model
To implement QoS, the switch must distinguish packets or flow from one another (classify), assign a
label to indicate the given quality of service as the packets move through the switch, make the packets
comply with the configured resource usage limits (police and mark), and provide different treatment
(queue and schedule) in all situations where resource contention exists. The switch also needs to ensure
that traffic sent from it meets a specific traffic profile (shape).
Figure 33-2 shows the basic QoS model. Actions at the ingress port include classifying traffic, policing,
marking, queueing, and scheduling:
• Classifying a distinct path for a packet by associating it with a QoS label. The switch maps the CoS
or DSCP in the packet to a QoS label to distinguish one kind of traffic from a nother. The QoS label
that is generated identifies all future QoS actions to be performed on this packet. For more
information, see the “Classification” section on page 33-4.
• Policing determines whether a packet is in or out of profile by comparing the rate of the incoming
traffic to the configured policer. The policer limits the bandwidth consumed by a flow of traffic. The
result is passed to the marker. For more information, see the “Policing and Marking” section on
page 33-8.
• Marking evaluates the policer and configuration information for the action to be taken when a packet
is out of profile and determines what to do with the packet (pass through a packet without
modification, mark down the QoS label in the packet, or drop the packet). For more information, see
the “Policing and Marking” section on page 33-8.
• Queueing evaluates the QoS label and the corresponding DSCP or CoS value to select into which of
the two ingress queues to place a packet. Queueing is enhanced with the weighted tail-drop (WTD)
algorithm, a congestion-avoidance mechanism. If the threshold is exceeded, the packet is dropped.
For more information, see the “Queueing and Scheduling Overview” section on page 33-13.
• Scheduling services the queues based on their configured shap ed round robin (SRR) weights. One
of the ingress queues is the priority queue, and SRR services it for its configured share before
servicing the other queue. For more information, see the “SRR Shaping and Sharing” section on
page 33-14.
Actions at the egress port include queueing and scheduling:
• Queueing evaluates the QoS packet label and the corresponding DSCP or CoS value before selecting
which of the four egress queues to use. Because congestion can occur when multiple ingress ports
simultaneously send data to an egress port, WTD differentiates traffic classes and subjects the