If you look at Tintin, you can see that Tintin is already using that NSAP address and has registered it onCasimir:
Tintin# show lane client
LE Client ATM1/0.1 ELAN name: ilmi−test Admin: up State: operational
Client ID: 2 LEC up for 39 seconds
Join Attempt: 4
HW Address: 0000.0000.0001 Type: ethernet Max Frame Size: 1516
ATM Address: 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.000000000001.01
VCD rxFrames txFrames Type ATM Address
0 0 0 configure 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4505.00
14 1 2 direct 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4503.01
15 1 0 distribute 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4503.01
16 0 1 send 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4504.01
17 2 0 forward 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.00603E5A4504.01
If you look at Casimir, you can see that this address has already been registered:
Casimir# show atm route 47.00918100000000603E5A4501.000000000001.01
Codes: I − internal prefix, E − exterior prefix
I 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0000.0000.0001/152
Node 1: Port ATM0/0/3, by routing−control, 00:01:06, uni scope 15
adv_trig 0x2, src_mask 0x2, node−index 0, rtaddr_index 1
Casimir# show atm route
Codes: P − installing Protocol (S − Static, P − PNNI, R − Routing control),
T − Type (I − Internal prefix, E − Exterior prefix, SE −
Summary Exterior prefix, SI − Summary Internal prefix,
ZE − Suppress Summary Exterior, ZI − Suppress Summary Internal)
P T Node/Port St Lev Prefix
~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P I 9 0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0010.1f2d.6801/104
P SI 1 0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501/104
R I 1 ATM0/0/3 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0000.0000.0001/152
R I 1 ATM2/0/0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4501/152
R I 1 ATM2/0/0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4502/152
R I 1 ATM2/0/0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4503/152
R I 1 ATM2/0/0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4504/152
R I 1 ATM2/0/0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0060.3e5a.4505/152
S E 1 ATM0/0/3 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.00d0.069a.7c40/152
R I 1 ATM2/0/0 UP 0 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.4000.0c/128
This means that Bernard is not able to register its address via ILMI, since it is a duplicate. When the debugatm ilmi atm x/y/z command is issued on Bernard and Casimir, these debugs can be seen:Bernard:
!−−− Output suppressed.
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Registration local validation attempt for
47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5a.4501.0000.0000.0001.01
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Sent Out. Will be added on confirmation
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0):Sending out Request 930
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0):Response received for request 929
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Errored response <General Error> Function Type = ilmiReqOther
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): Errored or no response received
1w1d: ILMI(ATM2/0/0): ES database update not done
Cisco − ILMI Address Registration Problems: %LANE−3−NOREGILMI