Chapter 7 Counters
© National Instruments Corporation 7-13 NI 6124/6154 User Manual
• Method 1 uses only one counter. It is a good method for many
applications. However, the accuracy of the measurement decreases as
the frequency increases.
Consider a frequency measurement on a 50kHz signal using an
80 MHz Timebase. This frequency corresponds to 1600 cycles of the
80 MHz Timebase. Your measurement may return 1600± 1 cycles
depending on the phase of the signal with respect to the timebase. As
your frequency becomes larger, this error of ±1 cycle becomes more
significant; Table7-1 illustrates this point.
• Method 1b (measuring K periods of F1) improves the accuracy of the
measurement. A disadvantage of Method 1b is that you have to take
K +1 measurements. These measurements take more time and
consume some of the available PCI or PXI bandwidth.
• Method 2 is accurate for high frequency signals. However, the
accuracy decreases as the frequency of the signal to measure
decreases. At very low frequencies, Method 2 may be too inaccurate
for your application. Another disadvantage of Method 2 is that it
requires two counters (if you cannot provide an external signal of
known width). An advantage of Method 2 is that the measurement
completes in a known amount of time.
• Method 3 measures high and low frequency signals accurately.
However, it requires two counters.
Table 7-1. Frequency Measurement Method 1
Task Equation Example 1 Example 2
Actual Frequency to Measure F1 50 kHz 5MHz
Timebase Frequency Ft 80MHz 80 MHz
Actual Number of Timebase
Periods
Ft/F1 1600 16
Worst Case Measured Number
ofTimebase Periods
(Ft/F1)– 1 1599 15
Measured Frequency Ft F1/(Ft – F1) 50.031kHz 5.33 MHz
Error [Ft F1/(Ft – F1)] – F1 31Hz 333 kHz
Error% [Ft/(Ft – F1)] – 1 0.06% 6.67%