AOC-04 Evaluation Program
13. | Is there any record of a | N/A | OK | Finding | Not Checked |
| maintenance schedule review |
|
|
|
|
| being carried out or the evaluation |
|
|
|
|
| of supplemental maintenance |
|
|
|
|
| requirements for applicability and |
|
|
|
|
| inclusion to the operators |
|
|
|
|
| program? |
|
|
|
|
| ∙ Were they included? |
|
|
|
|
| ∙ Does the outcome deviate |
|
|
|
|
| from manufacturers |
|
|
|
|
| recommendations; are the |
|
|
|
|
| conclusions stated and |
|
|
|
|
| decisions substantiated? (see |
|
|
|
|
| std 625) |
|
|
|
|
| Ref: CASS 726.07(4) / 625.86(5)(b)(I) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. | Are aircraft operational and | N/A | OK | Finding | Not Checked |
| environmental conditions |
|
|
|
|
| considered in the evaluation |
|
|
|
|
| program? (sample, review actual |
|
|
|
|
| process) |
|
|
|
|
| Ref: CASS 726.07(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. | *Is there evidence that the operator | N/A | OK | Finding | Not Checked |
| has reviewed and evaluated |
|
|
|
|
| Service Bulletins and other |
|
|
|
|
| technical information for |
|
|
|
|
| applicability to their fleet? |
|
|
|
|
| ∙ Is there evidence of a |
|
|
|
|
| maintenance specialist being |
|
|
|
|
| involved in the decision |
|
|
|
|
| process? |
|
|
|
|
| Ref: CASS 726.07(4) / ANB055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. | How would the company handle a | N/A | OK | Finding | Not Checked |
| service bulletin issued today which |
|
|
|
|
| affects their fleet? (sample / |
|
|
|
|
| interview, does the response |
|
|
|
|
| reflect stated procedures, follow |
|
|
|
|
| process through?) |
|
|
|
|
| Ref: CAR 706.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. |
| N/A | OK | Finding | Not Checked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 2001 |
|
|
| Page 17 |
