Manuals / Blade ICE / Computer Equipment / Personal Computer

Blade ICE G8124-E manual Internal Routing Versus External Routing, IBGP and eBGP

Models: G8124-E G8124

1 388
Download 388 pages 26.11 Kb
Page 260
Image 260

BLADEOS 6.5.2 Application Guide

Internal Routing Versus External Routing

To ensure effective processing of network traffic, every router on your network needs to know how to send a packet (directly or indirectly) to any other location/destination in your network. This is referred to as internal routing and can be done with static routes or using active, internal dynamic routing protocols, such as RIP, RIPv2, and OSPF.

Static routes should have a higher degree of precedence than dynamic routing protocols. If the destination route is not in the route cache, then the packets are forwarded to the default gateway which may be incorrect if a dynamic routing protocol is enabled.

It is also useful to tell routers outside your network (upstream providers or peers) about the routes you can access in your network. External networks (those outside your own) that are under the same administrative control are referred to as autonomous systems (AS). Sharing of routing information between autonomous systems is known as external routing.

External BGP (eBGP) is used to exchange routes between different autonomous systems whereas internal BGP (iBGP) is used to exchange routes within the same autonomous system. An iBGP is a type of internal routing protocol you can use to do active routing inside your network. It also carries AS path information, which is important when you are an ISP or doing BGP transit.

The iBGP peers have to maintain reciprocal sessions to every other iBGP router in the same AS (in a full-mesh manner) in order to propagate route information throughout the AS. If the iBGP session shown between the two routers in AS 20 was not present (as indicated in Figure 26), the top router would not learn the route to AS 50, and the bottom router would not learn the route to AS 11, even though the two AS 20 routers are connected via the RackSwitch G8124.

Figure 26 iBGP and eBGP

Internet

Typically, an AS has one or more border routers—peer routers that exchange routes with other ASs—and an internal routing scheme that enables routers in that AS to reach every other router and destination within that AS. When you advertise routes to border routers on other autonomous systems, you are effectively committing to carry data to the IPv4 space represented in the route being advertised. For example, if you advertise 192.204.4.0/24, you are declaring that if another router sends you data destined for any address in 192.204.4.0/24, you know how to carry that data to its destination.

260 ￿ Chapter 19: Border Gateway Protocol

BMD00220, October 2010

Page 259 Page 261
Page 260
Image 260
Blade ICE G8124-E manual Internal Routing Versus External Routing, IBGP and eBGP
Page 259 Page 261

G8124-E, G8124 specifications

The Blade ICE G8124 is a cutting-edge networking solution designed for high-performance data center environments. It has emerged as a popular choice among organizations that require reliable and efficient network infrastructure to support their growing demands for bandwidth and low-latency connectivity.

One of the key features of the Blade ICE G8124 is its high port density. This networking device typically offers 24 ports of 10 Gigabit Ethernet, ensuring that businesses can connect numerous devices without requiring extensive physical space. The design is also scalable, accommodating future expansion as organizational needs grow.

Another significant aspect of the G8124 is its advanced switching capabilities. It utilizes a non-blocking architecture, enabling simultaneous data transmissions on all ports. This characteristic ensures that there is no bottleneck in the network traffic, providing the high performance needed in data-intensive applications.

The G8124 incorporates various technologies to enhance its functionalities. It supports Layer 2 and Layer 3 switching, making it versatile for different networking needs. Additionally, it features comprehensive Quality of Service (QoS) settings that prioritize critical applications, such as VoIP and video streaming, ensuring smooth operation even under heavy loads.

In terms of security, the Blade ICE G8124 provides robust measures to protect the network. It supports features such as Access Control Lists (ACLs), port security, and VLANs, allowing administrators to segment the network and restrict unauthorized access. These security capabilities are vital in today’s landscape, where cyber threats are increasingly common.

Moreover, the G8124 offers excellent management features. It includes an intuitive user interface for easy configuration and monitoring of network performance. SNMP support allows integration with network management systems, providing administrators with insights needed to optimize their operations.

Power efficiency is also a hallmark of the Blade ICE G8124. It employs energy-saving technologies that reduce operational costs, an essential factor for environmentally-conscious organizations striving to minimize their carbon footprint.

In summary, the Blade ICE G8124 stands out with its high port density, advanced switching capabilities, robust security features, and efficient management options. This networking solution is designed to meet the demands of modern data centers, providing the performance, reliability, and scalability that organizations require. With its innovative technologies, the G8124 ensures that businesses can navigate the complexities of today's networking landscape effectively.