![vSW1](/images/new-backgrounds/102647/10264717x1.webp)
White Paper Consolidation of a
Client 1 | 1 GbE |
|
| ESX* Server | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| VM1 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Force 10 S50* | 10 GbE | ||||
|
|
|
| vSW1 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Client 8 | 1 GbE |
|
|
|
| VM8 | ||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 11.. Virtualized lab test setup..
| 0.30 |
(rms) | 0.25 |
| |
latency | 0.20 |
| |
Average | 0.15 |
0.10 | |
| 0.05 |
64 | 256 |
| 1024 | |||
|
| Packet size (bytes) |
| |||
| Native |
|
| VMDq |
| No VMDq |
|
|
|
Figure 12.. Netperf 2..4..4 UDP latency test with eight parallel streams..
Scenarios 2 and 3: Virtualized with and without VMDq/NetQueue
In these scenarios, the setup shown in Figure 11, consists of eight clients connected to eight
As mentioned earlier, in all the scenarios we used Netperf 2.4.4 UDP latency test and we ran the tests for UDP packet sizes of 64 bytes, 256 bytes, and 1024 bytes. The ESL workload used UDP packets of sizes varying from 40 to 200 bytes.
The results from these tests are summarized in Figure 12. In the graph, we are comparing native, virtualized with VMDq, and virtualized with no VMDq (represented by the blue, light blue, and gray bars, respectively). The horizontal axis represents various UDP packet sizes in bytes, and the vertical axis represents the average latency in milliseconds.
From Figure 12 it can be concluded that virtualization increases the latency. In fact, the latency is doubled (for
9