SAFETY
| The ratings are not guarantees. Results will vary | |
| depending on the user's hearing device and hearing | |
| loss. If your hearing device happens to be vulnerable | |
| to interference, you may not be able to use a rated | |
| phone successfully. Trying out the phone with your | |
| hearing device is the best way to evaluate it for your | |
| personal needs. | |
|
| |
| requirements and are likely to generate less | |
| interference to hearing devices than phones that are | |
| not labeled. M4 is the better/higher of the two | |
| ratings. | |
| Hearing devices may also be rated. Your hearing | |
| device manufacturer or hearing health professional | |
| may help you find this rating. Higher ratings mean | |
| that the hearing device is relatively immune to | |
SA | ||
interference noise. The hearing aid and wireless | ||
FE | phone rating values are then added together. A sum | |
T Y | of 5 is considered acceptable for normal use. A sum | |
| ||
| of 6 is considered for best use. |
In the above example, if a hearing aid meets the M2 level rating and the wireless phone meets the M3 level rating, the sum of the two values equal M5. This should provide the hearing aid user with “normal usage” while using their hearing aid with the particular wireless phone. “Normal usage” in this context is defined as a signal quality that is acceptable for normal operation.
The M mark is intended to be synonymous with the U mark. The T mark is intended to be synonymous with the UT mark. The M and T marks are recommended by the Alliance for Telecommunications Industries Solutions (ATIS). The U and UT marks are referenced in Section 20.19 of the FCC Rules. The HAC rating and measurement procedure are described in the American National
98
