Nortel Networks 7.05 Table of Figures, Table of Tables, Protection Profile Claims, Rationale

Security Target, Version 3.9March 18, 2008

7	PROTECTION PROFILE CLAIMS			51
	7.1	PROTECTION PROFILE REFERENCE		51
8	RATIONALE			52
	8.1	SECURITY OBJECTIVES RATIONALE		52
	8.2	SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS RATIONALE		55
	8.3	SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS RATIONALE		60
	8.4	RATIONALE FOR STRENGTH OF FUNCTION		60
	8.5	DEPENDENCY RATIONALE		60
	8.6	TOE SUMMARY SPECIFICATION RATIONALE		62
	8.6.1		TOE Summary Specification Rationale for the Security Functional Requirements	62
	8.6.2		TOE Summary Specification Rationale for the Security Assurance Requirements	63
	8.7	STRENGTH OF FUNCTION		65
9	ACRONYMS			66

Table of Figures

FIGURE 1 – VPN CLIENT DEPLOYMENT CONFIGURATION OF THE TOE		8
FIGURE 2 – BRANCH OFFICE DEPLOYMENT CONFIGURATION OF THE TOE		9
FIGURE 3	- PHYSICAL TOE BOUNDARY	10
FIGURE 4	- PHYSICAL TOE BOUNDARY IN BRANCH OFFICE TUNNEL MODE	10
FIGURE 5	- TOE LOGICAL BOUNDARY	12
FIGURE 6	- TOE LOGICAL BOUNDARY IN BRANCH OFFICE TUNNEL MODE	12

Table of Tables

TABLE 1 - ST, TOE, AND CC IDENTIFICATION AND CONFORMANCE			5
TABLE 2 - TERMINOLOGY			6
TABLE 3 - TOE SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS			20
TABLE 4 - AUDITABLE EVENTS			22
TABLE 5 - IT ENVIRONMENT SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS			39
TABLE 6	- ASSURANCE COMPONENTS		41
TABLE 7	- MAPPING OF TOE SECURITY FUNCTIONS TO SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS		42
TABLE 8	- FIPS-VALIDATEDCRYPTOGRAPHIC ALGORITHMS		45
TABLE 9	- ASSURANCE MEASURES MAPPING TO TOE SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS (SARS)		49
TABLE 10 - RELATIONSHIP OF SECURITY THREATS TO OBJECTIVES			52
TABLE 11		- RELATIONSHIP OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS TO OBJECTIVES	56
TABLE 12		- FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS DEPENDENCIES	60
TABLE 13		- MAPPING OF SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO TOE SECURITY FUNCTIONS	62
TABLE 14		- ACRONYMS	66

Nortel VPN Router v7.05 and Client Workstation v7.11	Page 4 of 67
© 2008 Nortel Networks