Table 10 (Page 2 of 2). JES2 Control Statements

Statement

Purpose

Comments

 

 

 

/*ROUTE PRT

Specifies the default print or

Use the // OUTPUT

or

punch destination for the job.

DEFAULT=YES instead.

/*ROUTE PUN

 

 

 

 

 

/*SETUP

Requests mounting of volumes

Seldom used. (Similar to VSE

 

needed for the job.

PAUSE statement)

 

 

 

/*SIGNOFF

Ends a remote job stream

BSC RJE Workstation use only.

 

processing session.

 

 

 

 

/*SIGNON

Begins a remote job stream

BSC RJE Workstation use only.

 

processing session.

 

 

 

 

/*XEQ

Specifies the execution node

(Short form of /*ROUTE XEQ)

 

for a job.

 

 

 

 

/*XMIT

Indicates a job or data stream

A // JOB card must precede

 

to be transmitted to another

this, and a job statement for

 

NJE node.

the execution node must follow

 

 

this.

 

 

 

4.5 VSE and MVS JCL Comparison Example

The following example jobs (4.5.1, Sample VSE JCL, 4.5.2, Sample MVS JCL, and 4.5.3, Sample VSE plus Carry-Over) show different ways to code the JCL to execute PROGRAM1, SORT, and PROGRAM2. Though these jobs appear to be different, the output is exactly the same in each example.

Step (Job) 1

PROGRAM1 reads data from TAPEIN (INPUT-TAPE in VSE and INPUT.TAPE in OS/390) and writes data to DISKOUT (WORK-DISK in VSE and WORK.DISK in OS/390).

Step (Job) 2

SORT takes data from SORTIN (WORK-DISK in VSE and WORK.DISK in OS/390) and writes sorted data to SORTOUT (WORK-DISK 2 in VSE and WORK.DISK2 in OS/390).

Step (Job) 3

PROGRAM2 reads data from DISKIN (WORK-DISK 2 in VSE and WORK.DISK2 in OS/390) and sends output to two different locations (Endicott and Boeblingen).

By comparing the file definitions described above you can see which JCL statements in VSE and MVS perform equivalent functions (TLBL or DLBL/EXTENT equate to DD, EXEC equates to EXEC, and so on). Notice also the very slight difference in syntax: VSE has a space after the ¢//¢, MVS does not unless it is a continuation card, also VSE continuation starts on column 16. In VSE, the file definitions precede the EXEC statement while in MVS they succeed the EXEC statement.

The JCL in ²4.5.1, Sample VSE JCL² and ²4.5.2, Sample MVS JCL ² show an equivalent relationship as to the placement of file definitions in the different

steps (that is, the file definitions are all in the step where they are used). By contrast ²4.5.3, Sample VSE plus Carry-Over² shows how file definitions can all

be located at the beginning of the VSE JCL and ²carried² throughout the entire

Chapter 4. Job Control Language (JCL) Differences and Considerations 91

Page 115
Image 115
IBM OS/390 manual VSE and MVS JCL Comparison Example, 2 of 2. JES2 Control Statements

OS/390 specifications

IBM OS/390, a versatile operating system, was a cornerstone in enterprise environments and played a pivotal role in mainframe computing. Released in the mid-1990s, OS/390 combined the strengths of IBM's MVS (Multiple Virtual Storage) with new features and enhancements, targeting scalability, reliability, and performance in demanding business applications.

One of the key features of OS/390 was its robust support for multiple users and processes. The system allowed thousands of concurrent users to access applications and data, ensuring high availability and minimizing downtime—a critical requirement for many large organizations. This scalability was supported through various enhancements in memory management and processor scheduling, enabling optimal resource allocation across diverse workloads.

OS/390 was known for its superior workload management capabilities. The Workload Manager (WLM) component allowed administrators to define service policies, specifying how system resources would be allocated according to the priority of tasks. This ensured that critical business processes received the necessary resources while less critical tasks were managed more flexibly.

Another significant characteristic of OS/390 was its commitment to security. The operating system provided comprehensive security features, including user authentication, data encryption, and auditing capabilities. This focus on security was vital for organizations handling sensitive data, ensuring compliance with regulations and safeguarding against unauthorized access.

OS/390 also supported advanced technologies that facilitated integration and development. The system included features like the IBM CICS (Customer Information Control System) for transaction processing and IMS (Information Management System) for database management. These technologies allowed organizations to build robust, high-performance applications tailored to specific business needs.

The ease of network integration was another strength of OS/390. With the advent of the Internet and global connectivity, OS/390 systems could easily interface with various network protocols, enabling businesses to operate in a connected world. This inclusion paved the way for many organizations to expand their capabilities and offer new services, driving digital transformation.

In conclusion, IBM OS/390 represented a significant advancement in mainframe technology, combining scalability, security, and robust workload management. Its rich feature set and support for critical enterprise applications solidified its role as a vital component of many organizations' IT infrastructures, ensuring they could meet their operational challenges head-on while supporting future growth. As technology continues to evolve, the legacy of OS/390 remains influential in the realm of computing.