Programmable button

A telephone button that can be set up to access a feature. On MLS- and MLC-model phones, programmable buttons can be used as Auto Dial buttons (for one-touch dialing of Centrex feature codes or telephone numbers) or equipment feature buttons.

Call Coverage Options

This section describes your options for providing call coverage when the user at an extension is not available to take calls. The following options are discussed:

■Central Call Coverage by a receptionist (the default)

■Centrex Call Coverage using Centrex features such as call forwarding or voice mail

■Local Call Coverage by another extension

■Coverage by an answering machine

■Additional options for extensions that provide call coverage.

An extension that picks up calls on another extension’s line is referred to as a covering extension. An extension whose calls can be picked up by another extension is referred to as a covered extension.

Central Call Coverage

Central Call Coverage—the default call coverage setup—lets a central receptionist answer calls that are not picked up by the user at the dialed extension. When a call comes in on a line, it rings first at the phone where the line is assigned as a primary line, but if the user at that extension does not pick it up, it also rings at the receptionist’s phone.

NOTE:

For a central receptionist, install an MLS-34D phone (which has 32 line/programmable buttons). This phone can easily handle the system maximum of 24 lines and still have eight programmable buttons available for features.

Customizing Your System 4-3

Page 50 Page 52
Page 51
Image 51
AT&T II manual Call Coverage Options, Central Call Coverage
Page 50 Page 52

II specifications

AT&T II, a pivotal case in the landscape of telecommunications regulation, emerged from the expansive antitrust actions against the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T). Following World War II, AT&T had established itself as a telecommunications behemoth, monopolizing the market. The ramifications of this dominance spurred a significant shift in regulatory measures, leading to the dissolution of the Bell System in 1984, which consisted of AT&T and its regional operating companies.

One key feature of AT&T II is its emphasis on promoting competition in the telecommunications sector. The court's decision aimed to dismantle the monopolistic practices that had stifled innovation and restricted consumer choice. By encouraging competition among various service providers, the ruling paved the way for an environment where new technologies could flourish.

The technologies that emerged post-AT&T II significantly transformed the telecommunications landscape. The introduction of new digital switching systems allowed for improved call quality and increased network efficiency. The evolution of fiber-optic technology also played a crucial role, enabling faster transmission speeds and greater data capacity. Moreover, innovative services, such as mobile telephony and broadband internet, proliferated as competition increased.

Another characteristic of AT&T II is its focus on accessibility and consumer protection. The ruling mandated that telecommunications services be available to a broader swath of the population, ensuring that underserved communities had access to essential communication services. This shift not only democratized access but also laid the groundwork for the modern internet revolution, fostering the growth of the digital economy.

The impact of AT&T II can also be seen in the regulatory frameworks that followed. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted policies aimed at enhancing market transparency and ensuring fair practices among competitors. These regulatory changes helped to create a more equitable playing field, allowing smaller companies to compete against established giants.

In summary, AT&T II marked a turning point in telecommunications history, characterized by a focus on competition, technological advancements, and consumer protection. The dissolution of AT&T's monopoly allowed for the rapid evolution of technology and services, ultimately benefiting consumers and fostering an environment ripe for innovation. This ruling not only redefined the telecommunications industry but also set a precedent for how markets are regulated in the United States.
Top Page Image Contents