Xilinx UG129 manual Why the PicoBlaze Microcontroller?, Why Use a Microcontroller within an FPGA?

Why the PicoBlaze Microcontroller?

R

The data registers and scratchpad RAM are not affected by Reset.

See “RESET Event” in Appendix C for more information.

Why the PicoBlaze Microcontroller?

There are literally dozens of 8-bit microcontroller architectures and instruction sets. Modern FPGAs can efficiently implement practically any 8-bit microcontroller, and available FPGA soft cores support popular instruction sets such as the PIC, 8051, AVR, 6502, 8080, and Z80 microcontrollers. Why use the PicoBlaze microcontroller instead of a more popular instruction set?

The PicoBlaze microcontroller is specifically designed and optimized for the Spartan-3, Virtex-II, and Virtex-II Pro FPGA architectures. Its compact yet capable architecture consumes considerably less FPGA resources than comparable 8-bit microcontroller architectures within an FPGA. Furthermore, the PicoBlaze microcontroller is provided as a free, source-level VHDL file with royalty-free re-use within Xilinx FPGAs.

Some standalone microcontroller variants have a notorious reputation for becoming obsolete. Because it is delivered as VHDL source, the PicoBlaze microcontroller is immune to product obsolescence as the microcontroller can be retargeted to future generations of Xilinx FPGAs, exploiting future cost reductions and feature enhancements. Furthermore, the PicoBlaze microcontroller is expandable and extendable.

Before the advent of the PicoBlaze and MicroBlaze™ embedded processors, the microcontroller resided externally to the FPGA, limiting the connectivity to other FPGA functions and restricting overall interface performance. By contrast, the PicoBlaze microcontroller is fully embedded in the FPGA with flexible, extensive on-chip connectivity to other FPGA resources. Signals remain within the FPGA, improving overall performance. The PicoBlaze microcontroller reduces system cost because it is a single-chip solution, integrated within the FPGA and sometimes only occupying leftover FPGA resources.

The PicoBlaze microcontroller is resource efficient. Consequently, complex applications are sometimes best portioned across multiple PicoBlaze microcontrollers with each controller implementing a particular function, for example, keyboard and display control, or system management.

Why Use a Microcontroller within an FPGA?

Microcontrollers and FPGAs both successfully implement practically any digital logic function. However, each has unique advantages in cost, performance, and ease of use. Microcontrollers are well suited to control applications, especially with widely changing requirements. The FPGA resources required to implement the microcontroller are relatively constant. The same FPGA logic is re-used by the various microcontroller instructions, conserving resources. The program memory requirements grow with increasing complexity.

Programming control sequences or state machines in assembly code is often easier than creating similar structures in FPGA logic.

Microcontrollers are typically limited by performance. Each instruction executes sequentially. As an application increases in complexity, the number of instructions required to implement the application grows and system performance decreases accordingly. By contrast, performance in an FPGA is more flexible. For example, an algorithm can be implemented sequentially or completely in parallel, depending on the

PicoBlaze 8-bit Embedded Microcontroller www.xilinx.com 15

UG129 (v1.1.2) June 24, 2008