and Qx,y in the figure), allowing data to still be preserved if two drives fail. Each set of parity data uses a capacity equivalent to that of one of the constituent drives.

This method is most useful when data loss is unacceptable but cost is also an important factor. The probability that data loss will occur when an array is configured with RAID 6 (ADG) is less than it would be if it was configured with RAID 5.

Advantages:

This method has a high read performance.

This method allows high data availability—Any two drives can fail without loss of critical data.

More drive capacity is usable than with RAID 1+0—Parity information requires only the storage space equivalent to two physical drives.

Disadvantages:

The main disadvantage of RAID 6 (ADG) is a relatively low write performance (lower than RAID 5) because of the need for two sets of parity data.

Comparing the hardware-based RAID methods

NOTE: Not all controllers support RAID 6 (ADG).

Item

RAID 0

RAID 1+0

RAID 5

RAID 6 (ADG)

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative name

Striping (no

Mirroring

Distributed

Advanced

 

fault

 

Data

Data

 

tolerance)

 

Guarding

Guarding

 

 

 

 

 

Formula for number of drives

n

n/2

n-1

n-2

usable for data (n = total number

 

 

 

 

of drives in array)

 

 

 

 

Fraction of drive space usable*

100%

50%

67% to 93%

50% to 96%

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum number of physical

1

2

3

4

drives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tolerates failure of one physical

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

drive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drive arrays and fault-tolerance methods 64

Page 64
Image 64
HP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 for Itanium-based Systems Comparing the hardware-based RAID methods, RAID RAID 6 ADG