CDM-Qx Satellite Modem

Revision 5

CnCPerformance Characterization

MN/CDMQx.IOM

 

Eb/No Degradation Versus

Carrier Spacing

 

 

QPSK 3/4 Turbo α = 20%

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

-0.5

 

 

 

 

Degradation

-1

 

 

 

 

-1.5

 

 

 

-3 dB

-2

 

 

 

0 dB

 

 

 

3 dB

 

 

 

 

Eb/No

-2.5

 

For Two Equally Space Carriers

6 dB

-3

 

 

 

Each With Level Relative To

 

 

 

 

 

 

-3.5

 

Desired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-4

 

 

 

 

 

0.70

0.90

1.10

1.30

1.50

 

 

Carrier Spacing Normalized To Symbol Rate

 

 

Eb/No Degradation Versus

Carrier Spacing

 

 

QPSK 3/4 Turbo, α = 35%

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

-0.5

 

 

 

 

Degradation

-1

 

 

 

 

-1.5

 

 

 

-3 dB

-2

 

 

 

0 dB

 

 

 

3 dB

 

 

 

 

Eb/No

-2.5

 

For Two Equally Space Carriers

6 dB

-3

 

 

 

Each With Level Relative To

 

 

 

 

 

 

-3.5

 

Desired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-4

 

 

 

 

 

0.70

0.90

1.10

1.30

1.50

 

 

Carrier Spacing Normalized To Symbol Rate

 

Figure D-2. QPSK 3/4 Turbo degradation versus relative carrier spacing (for two adjacent carriers)

 

 

Eb/No Degradation Versus Carrier Spacing

 

 

8-PSK 3/4 Turbo, α = 20%

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

Degradation

-0.2

 

 

 

 

-0.4

 

 

 

 

-0.6

 

 

 

-3 dB

-0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 dB

-1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 dB

-1.2

 

 

 

Eb/No

 

 

 

6 dB

-1.4

 

 

 

 

For Two Equally Space

 

-1.6

 

 

 

-1.8

 

Carriers Each With Level

 

 

 

Relative To Desired

 

 

-2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

 

Carrier Spacing Normalized To Symbol Rate

 

 

Eb/No Degradation Versus Carrier Spacing

 

 

8-PSK 3/4 Turbo, α = 35%

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

Degradation

-0.2

 

 

 

 

-0.4

 

 

 

-3 dB

 

 

 

 

-0.6

 

 

 

0 dB

-0.8

 

 

 

3 dB

Eb/No

-1.0

 

 

 

6 dB

 

For Two Equally Space

 

-1.2

 

 

 

Carriers Each With Level

 

 

 

 

 

-1.4

 

Relative To Desired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

 

Carrier Spacing Normalized To Symbol Rate

Figure D-3. 8-PSK 3/4 Turbo degradation versus relative carrier spacing (for two adjacent carriers)

 

 

Eb/No Degradation Versus Carrier Spacing

 

 

16-QAM 3/4 Turbo, α = 20%

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

Degradation

-0.5

 

 

 

 

-1.0

 

 

 

-3 dB

-1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 dB

-2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 dB

-2.5

 

 

 

Eb/No

 

For Two Equally Space

6 dB

-3.0

 

 

Carriers Each With Level

 

-3.5

 

 

Relative To Desired

 

 

-4.0

 

 

 

 

 

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

 

Carrier Spacing Normalized To Symbol Rate

 

 

Eb/No Degradation Versus Carrier Spacing

 

 

16-QAM 3/4 Turbo, α = 35%

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

Degradation

-0.5

 

 

 

 

-1.0

 

 

 

-3 dB

-1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 dB

-2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 dB

-2.5

 

 

 

Eb/No

 

For Two Equally Space

6 dB

-3.0

 

 

Carriers Each With Level

 

-3.5

 

 

Relative To Desired

 

 

-4.0

 

 

 

 

 

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

 

Carrier Spacing Normalized To Symbol Rate

Figure D-4. 16-QAM 3/4 Turbo degradation versus relative carrier spacing (for two adjacent carriers)

D–4

Page 246
Image 246
Mocomtech CDM-QX operation manual PSK 3/4 Turbo, α = 35%