The following table is a comparison of the features of authentication types.
Table 94 Comparison of EAP Authentication Types
| PEAP | LEAP | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual Authentication | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate – Client | No | Yes | Optional | Optional | No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate – Server | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamic Key Exchange | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credential Integrity | None | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deployment Difficulty | Easy | Hard | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client Identity Protection | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPA(2)
Key differences between WPA(2) and WEP are improved data encryption and user authentication.
Encryption
Both WPA and WPA2 improve data encryption by using Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP), Message Integrity Check (MIC) and IEEE 802.1x. In addition to TKIP, WPA2 also uses Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) in the Counter mode with Cipher block chaining Message authentication code Protocol (CCMP) to offer stronger encryption.
Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) uses
TKIP regularly changes and rotates the encryption keys so that the same encryption key is never used twice. The RADIUS server distributes a Pairwise Master Key (PMK) key to the AP that then sets up a key hierarchy and management system, using the
WPA2 AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is a block cipher that uses a
Appendix G Wireless LANs | 263 |