Resource sizing
Table 34: TDM and Media Processing usages (Erlangs) for Example 5: TDM and media processing usage
Endpoints |
| Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | ||
|
|
| (Atlanta) | (Boston) | (Cleveland) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Intrasite: I, I |
| TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | ||
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Intrasite: I, C or P |
| TDM: 76.8 | TDM: 26.7 | TDM: 14.4 | ||
| Media: 76.8 | Media: 26.7 | Media: 14.4 | |||
|
|
| ||||
Intrasite: C or P, C or P | TDM: 40.6 | TDM: 11.4 | TDM: 1.9 | |||
Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | ||||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| I | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | |
Calls from Site |
|
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |
1 to Site 2 |
| C or | TDM: 4.5 | TDM: 3.7 | TDM: 0 | |
|
| P | Media: 4.5 | Media: 3.7 | Media: 0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| I | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | |
Calls from Site |
|
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |
2 to Site 1 |
| C or | TDM: 4.5 | TDM: 3.7 | TDM: 0 | |
|
| |||||
|
| P | Media: 4.5 | Media: 3.7 | Media: 0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| I | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | |
Calls from Site |
|
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |
1 to Site 3 |
| C or | TDM: 1.8 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0.59 | |
|
| |||||
|
| P | Media: 1.8 | Media: 0 | Media: 0.59 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| I | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | |
Calls from Site |
|
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |
3 to Site 1 |
| C or | TDM: 1.8 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0.59 | |
|
| P | Media: 1.8 | Media: 0 | Media: 0.59 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| I | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | |
Calls from Site |
|
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |
2 to Site 3 |
| C or | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0.61 | TDM: 0.23 | |
|
| |||||
|
| P | Media: 0 | Media: 0.61 | Media: 0.23 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| I | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0 | |
Calls from Site |
|
| Media: 0 | Media: 0 | Media: 0 | |
3 to Site 2 |
| C or | TDM: 0 | TDM: 0.61 | TDM: 0.23 | |
|
| |||||
|
| P | Media: 0 | Media: 0.61 | Media: 0.23 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Totals |
| TDM: 130.0 | TDM: 46.7 | TDM: 17.9 | ||
|
|
| Media: 89.4 | Media: 35.3 | Media: 16.0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue 6 January 2008 207