Avaya Distributed Office
Avaya Distributed Office
Distributed Office is a communications system consisting of a number of geographically dispersed nodes or branches. Each branch contains a Distributed Office branch solution running both a SIP proxy server and a SIP feature server for local endpoints. The
Distributed Office has two branch hardware platforms: the i40, based on the various G250 gateways supporting up to 40 stations per branch, and the i120, based on the G350 gateway supporting up to 120 stations per branch. The i40 and the i120 generally observe the same resource configuration rules and constraints — for example, for VoIP channels, touch tone detectors, announcements ports, available media modules slots — as the G250 and G350 gateways on which they are based. Therefore, traffic engineering for each Distributed Office branch includes the same considerations as those for the corresponding G250 and G350 gateways.
Using SIP, the SES edge router mediates all communication between branch locations. An SES edge can support up to 1000 Distributed Office branches averaging up to 40 users per branch, for a total of up to 40,000 stations. The SES edge also handles traffic within one or more main sites consisting of one or two regular SES homes servicing one or two Communication Manager systems.
SIP traffic through the SES edge consists of the follow flows:
1.
2.
Note:
A main site consists of a large headquarters or business location served by
Communication Manager systems and SES homes.
3.Main site(s) call traffic between Communication Manager systems not linked by
4.Instant messaging between branches and SES homes
5.Presence subscription notification traffic between branches and SES homes
Traffic engineering for the SES edge consists of tracking and estimating the SIP message routing through the SES edge based on the above message flows. Since there can be only one SES edge, there is nothing to "configure," per se. Instead, traffic engineering provides an estimate of the traffic volume handled by the SES edge and compares it to known hardware performance levels to ensure a robust functioning system operating
Issue 6 January 2008 225