This soft copy for use by IBM employees only.
Next, we can use microsegmentation to reduce the number of workstations that have to share the
Finally, to further reduce the number of workstations sharing
Table 10 illustrates the before and after effects of our changes on the available bandwidth.
Table 10. Bandwidth Improvement with
Device | Maximum Bandwidth Available | Bandwidth | |||
|
| After...(Kbps) |
| Improvement | |
|
|
|
|
| Ratio2 |
| Server | ATM | Micro- | ATM25 | |
|
| ||||
| Offload | Server | segment | Offload |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Server | 32000 | 155000 | 155000 | 155000 | 811x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Server | 32000 | 32000 | 32000 | 32000 | 167x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 | 200 | 4000 | 49423 | 25x | |
Desktop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Desktop | 200 | 200 | 4000 | 25000 | 130x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
1In this case assuming an even distribution of four workstations per segment on each of 21 available
2Calculated by dividing the total bandwidth available after the change by the original bandwidth available per device, which was calculated by dividing the total bandwidth available by the number of devices sharing it. In this case, the original bandwidth calculation is: 16,000 Kbps/segment * 1 segment / (80 users + 4 servers) = 191 Kbps/device.
3.This is an average value. The 12 segments with three devices/segment would actually receive 5,333 Kbps while the remaining nine segments would have four devices apiece, each receiving 4,000 Kbps.