
APPENDIX
CONCLUSION
The results of this benchmark study show that for the programs used, the Intel iAPX 88/10 significantly out- performed the Motorola MC6809. In absolute execution speed, the iAPX 88/10 proved to be 860{0 faster than the MC6809 (using the Adjusted Average). When compared at equal memory access times, the iAPX 88/10 outper- formed the MC6809 by 1l00{0. On the basis of coding efficiency, the iAPX 88/10 generated less than half as much object code as the MC6809. In the Ease of Pro- gramming category, the results showed that the MC6809 required more than 2.6 times the number of lines of code required by the iAPX 88/10. These results are summarized in the table below.
Table 6. Performance Breakdown
| Performance Ratio of |
Performance Category | iAPX 88 to MC6809 |
Execution Speed | iAPX 88/10 is J.86X |
(Fastest) | faster |
Execution Speed' | iAPX 88/10 is 2. lOX |
| faster |
Coding Efficiency | iAPX 88/10 is J.47X |
| more efficient |
Ease of Programming | iAPX 88/10 is 2.67X |
| more efficient |
"WIth equal speed memory |
|
The iAPX 88 is the highest performance
" I
,I I
I
/
!
27 | AFN 01532A |