Intel® 820E Chipset

R

2.Layout/Routing Guidelines

This chapter documents the motherboard layout and routing guidelines for Intel 820E chipset-based systems. This chapter does not discuss the functional aspects of any bus or the layout guidelines for an add-in device.

Caution: If the guidelines in this document are not followed, it is very important to complete thorough signal integrity and timing simulations for each design. Even if the guidelines are followed, critical signals still should be simulated to ensure proper signal integrity and flight time. As bus speeds increase, it is imperative that the guidelines documented be followed precisely. Any deviation from these guidelines must be simulated!

2.1.General Recommendations

The trace impedance typically noted (i.e., 60 Ω ± 10%) is the “nominal” trace impedance. That is, it is the impedance of a trace when not subjected to the fields created by changing the current in neighboring traces. When calculating flight times, it is important to consider the minimum and maximum impedance of a trace based on the switching of neighboring traces. This trace-to-trace coupling can be minimized by using wider spaces between the traces. In addition, these wider spaces reduce crosstalk and settling time.

Coupling between two traces is a function of the coupled length, the distance separating the traces, the signal edge rate, and the degree of mutual capacitance and inductance. To minimize the effects of trace- to-trace coupling, the routing guidelines documented in this chapter should be followed. In addition, the PCB should be fabricated as documented in Section 5.1.

Except where noted, all recommendations in this chapter assume 5 mil-wide traces. If the trace width is greater than 5 mils, then the trace spacing requirements must be adjusted accordingly (and linearly). For example, this chapter recommends routing most AGP signals with 5 mil traces on 20 mil spaces (1:4). If 6 mil traces are used, then 24 mil spaces must be used (also 1:4). Using a wider trace—and therefore wider spaces—will make routing more difficult.

Additionally, these routing guidelines are created using the stack-up described in Section 5.1. If this stack-up is not used, extremely thorough simulations of every interface must be completed. Using a thicker dielectric (prepreg) will make routing very difficult or impossible.

2.2.Component Quadrant Layout

The quadrant layouts shown are approximate and the exact ball assignments should be used to conduct routing analysis. These quadrant layouts are designed for use during component placement.

Design Guide

27

Page 27
Image 27
Intel 820E manual General Recommendations, Component Quadrant Layout